摘要
盗窃行为的行政处罚一般都设定了自由罚,主要是基于处罚的威慑力和执行的方便。《森林法》对盗伐林木行为没有设定自由罚,导致在执法实践中遭遇一些困难。盗伐林木行为虽然侵犯了两种客体,但其核心特征还是侵犯他人的财产权利,属于盗窃行为的一种,应该设定自由罚。另外,行为罚"补种"遭遇执行困境,应该取消";赔偿损失"不属于行政处罚,无需在《森林法》中规定;"没收盗伐的林木或者变卖所得"侵犯了受害人的财产权,应该取消;罚款数额与林木价值挂钩的规定给执法活动带来不必要的成本,应取消罚款数额与林木价值挂钩的规定,直接规定罚款的额度即可。
Based on the penalty deterrent force and the ease of execution,there exists a freedom penalty in administrativep punishment of theft acts.＂Forest law＂ set no freedom penalty on the felling forest behavior,which results in some difficulties in the practice of law enforcement.This research finds that chopping down trees unlawfully violated the two objects and should set a freedom punishment and should abolish the behavior punishment ＂replant＂ andshould alter some other related punishments.
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2012年第1期74-79,共6页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
盗伐
自由罚
行政处罚
chopping down trees unlawfully
freedom penalty
administrative punishment
