期刊文献+

退耕还林工程效益评价指标体系研究 被引量:3

A Study of the Index System for Evaluating the Benefits of Returning Farmland to Forest Programs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 退耕还林工程效益评价指标体系的构建是一种趋势性需要。已有的效益评价体系主要反映在生态效益、费用成本和产出收益等方面。我国退耕还林工程尚缺乏规范的评价体系。通过对规范指标筛选原则、确定指标权重、建立动态更新的指标库等方法实现评价指标体系规范化的可行性的探讨,认为指标库的首要特点应是动态更新性,可借鉴美国EBI指标体系管理及更新方法管理指标库。指标体系的构建既要以生态效益评价为重点,又要充分反映经济、社会等方面的效益。加强对我国效益评价体系的规范化研究,有助于实现工程管理的规范化、效益评价的准确客观性、不同时空研究的可较性等。采用指标库方法建立我国退耕还林效益评价体系的可行性还需要进一步的研究。 Building the benefit evaluation index system (BEIS) of Retuming Farmland to Forest Programs (RFFP) has been a trend. The coo-efficiency, cost, and output or incomes have been mainly reflected in BEIS of RFFP in domestic and international projects. However, a standardized BEIS is still lacking in Chi- na. So, in this paper, a discussion was made on the possible measures to build standardized BEIS of RFFP in China, including the criterion of selecting indicators, making certain indicators weight methods, and building continually updating index databases, and so on. The main characteristic of index databases should be continually updated, and management of index databases could follow the experience of EBI in America. For fully reflecting the effectiveness of RFFP in China, building BEIS should not only focus on the evaluation of ecological benefits, but also fully reflect the economic, social and other benefits. Further studies of standardized BEIS of RFFP should be strengthened for contributing towards the standardization of RFFP management, effective and accurate evaluation of BEIS, and comparison of studies in different spatial and temporal conditions and so on. The further studies should be made of the feasibility of building BEIS of RFFP of China with index databases.
出处 《四川林业科技》 2012年第1期23-28,共6页 Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAC01A11) 国家自然科学基金(30872014)
关键词 退耕还林 效益 评价 指标库 Returning farmland to forest programs, Benefit, Evaluation, Index database
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Kellogg R L. Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices: the conservation effects assessment project [ C ]//AllenAW, Vandever MW. The conservation reserve program-planting for the future: proceedings of a national conference, Fort Collins, Colorado ,June 6 - 9,2004 : U. S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline, Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5145. 2005:22 - 27. 被引量:1
  • 2Gilley J E, Doran J W, Eghball B. Tillage and fallow effects on se-lected soil quality characteristics of former conservation reserve program sites [ J ]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 56(2) :126 - 132. 被引量:1
  • 3Jiang P, Anderson SH, Kitchen NR, et al. Landscape and conservation management effects on hydraulic properties of a Claypan soil Topocequence [ J ]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2007,71 (3) :803 -811. 被引量:1
  • 4Das C, Capehart W J, Mott H V, et al. Assessing regional impacts of conservation reserve progrmn-type grass buffer strips on sedi-ment load reduction from cultivated lands [ J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation ,2004,59 (4) : 134 - 141. 被引量:1
  • 5Kuhnle R A, Bingner R L, Alonso C V, et al. Conservation practice effects on sediment load in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed [ J ]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008,63 (6) :496 -454. 被引量:1
  • 6Herkert J R. Conservation reserve program benefits on Henslow's sparrows within the United States [ J]. Journal of Wildlife Management,2007,71 ( 8 ) : 2749 - 2751. 被引量:1
  • 7McCoy T D, Ryan M R, Burger J L W, et al. Grassland bird conservation: CP1 vs. CP2 plantings in conservation reserve program fields in Missouri [ J]. The American Midland Naturalist,2001, 145(1) :1 -16. 被引量:1
  • 8Hajkowicz S, Collins K, Cattaneo A. Review of agri-environment indexes and stewardship payments [ J ]. Environmental Management,2009,43:221 - 236. 被引量:1
  • 9Cullen R, Moran E, Hughey K F D. Measuring the success and cost effectiveness of New Zealand multiple-species projects to the conservation of threatened species [ J ]. Ecological Economics ,2005, 53:311 - 323. 被引量:1
  • 10Marinoni O, Higgins A, Hajkowicz S, et al. The Multiple Criteria Analysis Tool (MCAT):a new software tool to support environmental investment decision making [ J]. Environmental Modeling& Software,2009,24 : 153 - 164. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

共引文献8

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部