摘要
目的探讨微创治疗肺大疱并气胸的疗效以及安全性。方法回顾分析采用微创方法治疗的68例肺大疱并气胸患者的资料(观察组),并与腋下小切口手术的患者相对照(对照组),比较2组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组术中出血量和手术时间低于对照组,患者术后恢复良好,2组间的比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,病患动脉氧分压(PO2)的比较差异具有统计学意义。结论两种治疗肺大疱并气胸的方法均有效,但微创治疗效果更佳,安全性更强。
Objective To discuses the clinical safety and eficacy of minimally surgical lung bulbous treated. Methods We reviewed the- clinical data of 68 cases of lung bullous treated by surgical lung bulbous treated, and take small incision surgical treatment datas of another 68 patients as control group, comparing the clinical curative effect between two groups. Results Operation time, bleed loss was lower than control group, the comparison between the two groups were statistically significant（ P 〈 0.05 ）. In two groups, PO2 were obviously improved, difference has statistical significance（P 〈0.01 ）. Conclusion Both treatments are effective,but the effect of minimally invasive surgery is better.
出处
《河南外科学杂志》
2012年第2期4-5,共2页
Henan Journal of Surgery
关键词
微创治疗
肺大疱并气胸
疗效
安全性
Minimally invasive surgery
Lung bullous
Efieacy
Safety
