摘要
《非法证据排除规定》的施行,改变了长期以来职务犯罪侦查机关办案人员一般不出庭作证的局面。侦查人员出庭作证的确有其必要性,但是要求每一起案件的侦查人员都出庭作证在我国当前国情下是既无可能也无必要,适用时有其限制条件。由于我国目前在法律层面上未对侦查人员出庭作证作出明确、具体的规定,这一制度在贯彻执行中将会面临一些问题,需从转变观念、获取证据、外部协作、保障措施以及培训力度等多个路径应对。
＂ illegal evidence exclusion rule＂ for the purposes, change the long - crimes investigators investigative agencies generally do not testify in court situation. Indeed, investigators testify in court were necessary, but require each case the investigators have to testify under the current conditions in our country is neither possible nor necessary to, where applicable~ has its limitations. As our country is not on the legal level investigators to testify in court to make clear and specific previsions, the system will face in the implementation of a number of issues that need to shift from the concept of access to evidence, external collaboration, security measures and training efforts other paths to deal with.
出处
《宜春学院学报》
2011年第11期38-40,47,共4页
Journal of Yichun University
关键词
反贪侦查
出庭作证
限制
路径
anticorruption investigators
Appear in court as a witness
Limit
path
