摘要
从《辛丑条约》议定过程而言,传统认识理解为帝国主义的"争赃"竞赛,谈判过程全为西人主导,清朝一方对议题几乎没有介入。这一种印象或结论的产生,主要是依赖外国一侧史料建筑史实的后果。议和过程中,清朝一方虽然对议题缺少发言权,却并非全无努力,其内部西安政府(那拉氏、军机处)、北京全权(奕、李)、东南督抚(刘、张、盛、袁)等多种力量互动频繁,唯因相互制约造成内耗,本来的多方合作反而滑向多方角力的态势,未能形成有效的对外合力。这一现象也成为近代外交转型的重要背景之一。本文拟从"惩董(福祥)"问题切入,通过实证性的个案研究,从一侧面观察当时清政府外交及内部政治关系的实状。
In terms of the signing process of the Treaty of 1901,traditionally it was regarded as a competition of handling stolen goods of imperialism,having westerners as the dominant power in the negotiation with no involvement of the Qing dynasty.This impression or conclusion was drawn from foreign historical record.In the negotiation process,though the Qing dynasty had little say for the subject,it did make its own effort.The interactions between its internal parts were frequent,which causes friction by mutual restrictions.Originally,cooperation between various parts slide into the trend of multi-wrestling,and finally failed to form an effective external force.This phenomenon became one of the key backgrounds in modern foreign diplomatic transfer.In this paper,the author introduced the incident of ＂punishing Dong＂,presented real case of diplomatic relations of the Qing dynasty and internal political relations.
出处
《北方民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2012年第1期5-18,共14页
Journal of North Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
辛丑条约
董福祥
惩祸
张之洞
李鸿章
荣禄
the Treaty of 1901
Dong Fu-xiang
punishment
Zhang Zhi-dong
Li Hong-zhang
Rong Lu
