摘要
作为民国时期以所谓文化保守主义者著称的柳诒徵,其晚年代表作《国史要义》,与近世言史学的其他著作比较,既不似文化守旧者之迂,又不像以西法论史学者与传统史学之隔阂,庶几可视为使我们脱开些西方学科理论影响,一窥传统史学堂奥的密钥。而在理解中国传统史学的同时,面对"传统"与"现代"的二元对立观念的纠缠,或在现代的学科格局中,怎样完成传统史学学术的创造性转换,也是我们阅读《国史要义》时有必要思考的重要问题。
Liu Yizheng is known as a so-called cultural conservative in the period of Republic of China. However, contrast with other works about historiography at that time, the representative of his later years GUOSHIYAOYI, is neither pedantic as the conservative activists, nor gap with the traditional historiography as scholars who study history use of western theories. This book can be regarded as a key to torn off the influence from western academic theories and allows us to get a thorough understanding of traditional Chinese historiography. In addition, when reading GUOSHIYAOYI, how to complete the creative transformation of traditional historiography facing with ＂ traditional＂ and ＂ modern＂ concept of entangled binary opposition in the current structure of disciplines is also an important issue we need to think about.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期66-74,共9页
Journal of Historiography
基金
教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“民国时期史学之研究”(项目号:10JJD770005)阶段性成果
