期刊文献+

两种直径种植体对上颌窦黏膜形变影响的有限元分析

Effect of two different diameter implants on deformation of maxillary sinus mucosa:A three-dimensional finite element analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:上颌窦黏膜形变温和均匀是减少骨挤压式上颌窦提升手术中黏膜穿孔的重要因素。目的:比较两种直径种植体对上颌窦黏膜形变的影响。方法:在ANSYS有限元软件的特定单元中分别建立直径4.1mm和4.8mm的ITI种植体与厚0.3mm的上颌窦黏膜的有限元模型,模拟上颌窦提升手术抬高黏膜,根据大变形理论计算不同提升高度黏膜表面Vonmises应力值。结果与结论:结果显示,最大Vonmise应力发生在黏膜中心,最小Vonmise应力发生在黏膜边缘。两种直径种植体对黏膜中心作用力差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),而对黏膜边缘作用力,直径4.8mm种植体较4.1mm种植体具有更加均匀温和的作用力。因此,在骨宽度允许的情况下,直径4.8mm的种植体更适合用于骨挤压式上颌窦提升手术。 BACKGROUND: Mild and uniform deformation of maxillary sinus mucosa is an important factor that reduces the incidence of mucosal perforation during maxillary sinus elevation by using bone condensing technology. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two diameter implants on the deformation of maxillary sinus mucosa. METHODS: Three-dimensional finite element models of the maxillary sinus mucosa (thickness 0.3 mm) with two diameter implants (4.1 mm, 4.8 mm) were established in the special unit of ANSYS software. Maxillary sinus elevation operation was simulated. Von Mises stress values of mucosa surface with different lifting height was calculated according to the finite deformation theory. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The maximum stresses of all models existed in the center of the mucosa and the minimum stresses existed in the edge of the mucosa. There was no significant difference in the stress to the center of the mucosa between the two diameter implants (P 0.05), but the stress in the edge of mucosa of the larger diameter implant (4.8 mm) was significantly less than that of the stress in the edge of the small diameter implant (4.1 mm). The larger diameter implant (4.8 mm) has less stress for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor in the case of allowed width.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第52期9742-9745,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 广东省医学科研课题资助(A2009095) 课题名称:骨挤压式上颌窦提升术的计算机力学分析研究~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Pommer B,Unger E,Süt(o) D,et al.Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro.Clin Oral Implants Res.2009; 20(6):633-637. 被引量:1
  • 2Toffler M.Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation:a clinical report.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2004;19(2):266-273. 被引量:1
  • 3Barone A,Santini S,Sbordone L,et al.A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2006;21(1):81-85. 被引量:1
  • 4Berengo M,Sivolella S,Majzoub Z,et al.Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2004;33(2):189-194. 被引量:1
  • 5Ferrigno N,Laureti M,Fanali S.Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation:a 12-year life-table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants.Clin Oral Implants Res.2006;17(2):194-205. 被引量:1
  • 6Gross MD,Nissan J,Samuel R.Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry.Part I.J Prosthet Dent.2001;85(5):442-449. 被引量:1
  • 7Gross MD,Nissan J.Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry.Part II.J Prosthet Dent.2001;85(5):450-454. 被引量:1
  • 8朱卓立,宫苹,焦锡葳.上颌窦提升术与上颌窦炎相关性研究现状[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2004,31(6):467-469. 被引量:8
  • 9Baccar MN,Laure B,Chabut A,et al.Stability of graft sand implants after bone grafting of the maxillary sinus.Retrospective analysis of 44 patients.Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac.2005; 106 (3):153-156. 被引量:1
  • 10Degidi M,Daprile G,Piattelli A,et al.Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values,at insertion surgery,of implants placed in sinus-augmented and nongrafted sites.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2007;9(3):144-149. 被引量:1

二级参考文献105

共引文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部