摘要
"复仇"作为传统母题之一,在不同的时代、不同作家的文本中有着不同的书写模式,对此进行比较研究可以帮助我们更为深刻地认识文本及作家。传统复仇文学中的复仇书写常常遵循"为富不仁——投告无门——暴力复仇"的三步走模式,在"红色经典"文本中得到继承的同时被加以改造,从而形成了"为富必不仁——投告总无门——武装革命"的新情节。这是传统复仇文化与现代阶级观念合谋的产物,同时是作家自觉地放弃了某些独立思考与追求配合政治宣传的结果。
As one of the traditional motifs, ＂revenge＂ takes on different models in different times and different writers＇ works. This research can help us have a deeper understanding of the writers and their works. In traditional revenge literature, revenge usually follows three steps： the rich being unmerciful--no way to appeal--revenge with violence. This model succeeded and was reconstructed in ＂red classics＂ and helped form a new style, ＂all rich being unmerciful--always no way to appeal--armed revenge＂. This model is the result of influences of both traditional revenge culture and modern classless thought. And the other reason is that the writers abandoned their independent thought consciously and pursued cooperation with political posturing.
出处
《学术探索》
CSSCI
2012年第1期143-145,共3页
Academic Exploration
基金
山东大学研究生自主创新基金"文学创作与法治观念--论当代中国大陆文学对中国法制化进程的书写"(项目号:11070070613014)
关键词
复仇
情节模式
红色经典
revenge
plot pattern
red classics
