期刊文献+

尼扎替丁治疗老年胃食管反流病 被引量:2

Effect of Nizatidine in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Dise ase in Elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察尼扎替丁治疗老年胃食管反流病的疗效。方法:将116例老年胃食管反流病随机分为3组:A组 40例8组 38例(组 38例,分别应用奥美拉唑 20 mg。尼扎替 丁 150 mg。雷尼替丁150 mg,bid × 4周;然后分别改为20 mg、150 mg、150mg qd至 6个月.于治疗 4周、3月、6月后观察各组总有效率。结果:显示 B组 4周、3月、6月总有效率分别为81.58%、89.47%。94.47%,与A组相比(分别为85.00%、90.00%、95.00%)无显著性差异(P>0.05);而与C组相比(分别为 65.79%。76.72%、78.95%)有显著性差异(P<0.05)。症状积分与总有效率结果一致。结论:尼扎替丁治疗老年胃食管反流病与奥美拉唑疗效相仿,优于雷尼替丁,且价廉、副作用少。 Purpose: To observe the efficacy of nizatidine in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in elderly. Methods: 116 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in elderly were randomly di- vided into 3 groups: 40 patients was treated with omeprazole 20 mg bid for 4 wk; 38 patients was treated with nizatidine 150 mg bid for 4wk; 38 patients was treated with ranitidine 150 mg bid for 4wk, then de- creased to omeprazole 20mg, qd, and nizatidine 150 mg pd, and ranitidine 150 mg, qd. for 6 mo. Observ- ing the efficacy in the course of treatment 4wk, 3mo, 6mo. Results: The total effective rates of nizatidine and omeprazole were 81. 58 %, 89. 47 %, 94. 47 % and 85. 00 %, 90. 00 %, 95. 00 % in the course of treat- ment 4wk, 3mo, 6mo (P > 0. 05 ). The total effective rates of ranitidine were 65. 79 %, 76. 72 %, 78. 95 %. They were significant difference (P < 0. 05) in the nizatidine and ranitidine. The result of symptom score was accordance with that of the total effective rates. Conclusion: The efficacy of nizatidine is similar to that of omeprazole and nizatidine is more effective than ranitidine in the treatment of gastroesophageal re- flux disease in elderly. It is a cheap and safe drug.
出处 《临床消化病杂志》 2000年第1期20-22,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
关键词 尼扎替丁 奥美拉唑 雷尼替丁 胃食管反流病 治疗 Nizatidine Omeprazole Ranitidine Gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dehn TCB, Shepherd HA, Colin-Jones D, et al. Double blind comparison of omeprazole (40 mg qd) versus cimetidine (400 mg qd) in the treatment of symptomatic erosive reflux esophagitis, assessed endoscopically, histologically and by 24h pH monitoring. Gut, 1990,31:509. 被引量:1
  • 2Dent J, Watts R, Riley S, et al. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care. An international study of different treatmeat strategies with omeprazole. Gastroenterology,1996,110:A93. 被引量:1
  • 3Laursen LS, Harelund T, Bondesen S, et al. Omeprozole in the longterm treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. A double-blind randomized does finding study. Scaud J Gasttoenterol,1995,30:839. 被引量:1
  • 4Veaables T, Newland R, Patel AC, et al. A comparison of omeprazole 10mg and 20mg qd with ranitidine 150mg bid for the treatment of GERD in primary care. Gut,1995,37(supp1 2):A45. 被引量:1
  • 5姚光弼 萧树东 等.第10届国际胃肠病学大会报道[J].中华消化杂志,1995,15(1):30-45. 被引量:6
  • 6Savary M, Miller C. The esoophagus. In: Gossman AG. Handbook and atlas of endoscopy. Switzerland: solothurn,1987,67. 被引量:1
  • 7Triadafilopaulos G, Kaczynska M, wane M, Role of esophageal mucosal eicosanoids in gastroesophageal reflux disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 1996,91:65. 被引量:1
  • 8Raiha IJ, Heitanen E, Sourander LB. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in elderly people. Age Aging,1991,20:365. 被引量:1
  • 9Raiha lJ, lmpivaara O, Soppala M, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease in the elderly. Jam Geriater Soc,1992;40:1209. 被引量:1
  • 10Zhu H, Pace F, Sangaletti O, et al. Features of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in elderly patients. Scand J Gastroenterol,1993,28:235. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部