摘要
"荷兰病"和"资源诅咒"现象说明,过分依赖资源产品出口对经济发展是非常危险的。因此,对资源产品出口进行合理管制十分必要。本文把资源中间品部门引入了Solow增长模型,分析了资源中间品出口国经济增长路径的基本特征,并考察了"荷兰病"现象产生的基本机制。进而分析和比较了出口税和出口配额两种资源产品出口管制政策工具在治理"荷兰病"方面的效果。本文的分析指出,虽然资源产品出口税和出口配额都可以有效治理"荷兰病",但其作用机制和效果存在差异。出口税会直接将资源中间品部门的绝对规模锁定在意愿水平,而出口配额则会把资源中间品部门和最终产品部门的相对规模锁定在意愿水平。
The ＂Dutch disease＂ and ＂Resource curse＂ warn us that overly depending on certain abundant nat- ural resource could be very dangerous to economic growth. So it is necessary to control the export of resource good. This paper contributes to the analysis on the effects of policy tools on controlling resource good export. The model in this study is based on Solow＇s economic growth model. Tradable resource intermediate good is introduced into this model and the characteristics of economic growth route of resource export country is discussed. This paper then shows that how ＂Dutch disease＂ is induced by the expanding of natural resource stock and the difference of the effects of export tax and quota on addressing ＂Dutch disease＂. The study indicates that both the two tools are able to prevent the shrinking of manufacture sector, but the mechanisms are diverse. Export tax would set the capital stock of resource intermediate goods sector to an expected level, but quota would set the capital stock ratio of inter- mediate goods sector versus final good sector to an expected level.
出处
《经济管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第12期1-9,共9页
Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"资源约束
资源贸易与发展中大国的经济增长"(10YJCGJW005)
关键词
资源中间品
资源贸易
经济增长
出口管制
economic growth
resource intermediate good
resource trade
export control
