摘要
目的:比较两种种植体周围炎非手术治疗的临床疗效。方法:选择44例种植体周围炎患者(44枚种植体),随机分组,分别进行树脂洁治和超声洁治,分别在基线、4周和8周时测龈沟出血指数、探诊深度和最深探诊深度,进行统计学分析。结果:两种治疗方法均可明显改善牙龈出血,但不能改善探诊深度和最深探诊深度。结论:树脂洁治和超声洁治对种植体周围炎的治疗仅为有限效果。
Objective：To assess the elinical outcomes of two non-surgical mechanical debridement methods of periimplantitis. Method：44 patients with one implant each, demonstrating peri-implantitis were randomized, and those treated either with hand-instruments or with an ultrasonie device were enrolled. Clinical parameters were reeorded at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks respectively. Result： Suleus Bleeding Indexes have significant deereased （P 〈0.05） in both groups, with no group differences. No differences in probing depth and the deepest probing depth were found over time in both groups. Conclusion： The clinical treatment results were limited and similar between both groups.
出处
《临床口腔医学杂志》
2011年第12期727-728,共2页
Journal of Clinical Stomatology
