期刊文献+

经脐单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术对比的单中心回顾性研究 被引量:10

Retrospective comparison of single-incison and three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: A single center experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:回顾性比较分析经脐单孔与同期多孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者的临床资料,探讨前者的安全性和可行性。方法:收集2009年1月—2011年5月行腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者53例。其中,单孔法组32例,三孔法组21例。对两组围手术期资料进行比较分析。结果:全部患者均顺利完成腹腔镜阑尾切除。两组患者在平均手术时间(P=0.358)和术中出血量(P=0.595)方面的比较无统计学差异;单孔组患者术后肠道功能恢复早于多孔组(1.2±0.4 d vs 1.5±0.5 d,P=0.029)。所有患者均于术后5 d内出院(3.8±0.8 d vs 4.0±0.9 d,P=0.462)。术后随访1个月~2年,两组患者并发症的发生率无统计学差异。结论:经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全、有效,美容效果好,具有可行性。其临床应用价值仍需进一步的临床研究证实。 Objective: To explore the safety and feasibility of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy.Methods: From Jan 2009 to May 2011,53 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.There were 32 patients in the single-incision group and 21 patients in the conventional group.Collect and compare the clinical data of the two groups.Results: All the operations were successfully completed with no significant difference in mean operation time(P=0.358) and blood loss(P=0.595).Patients in the single-incision group resumed normal bowel activity earlier than those in the conventional group(1.2±0.4 d vs 1.5±0.5 d,P=0.029).All the patients discharged from hospital within 5 days after operation(3.8±0.8 d vs 4.0±0.9 d,P=0.462).The postoperative complications between the two groups had no significant difference after a period of 1 to 24 months.Conclusion: Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and feasible,while its clinical application needs further study.
出处 《中国现代普通外科进展》 CAS 2011年第11期855-857,共3页 Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
关键词 阑尾切除术 腹腔镜 单孔 Appendectomy·Laparoscopy·Single-incision
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kirsten Hall Long, Michael P. Bannon, Scott P. Zietlow, et al. A Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses[J]. Surgery., 2001, 129(4):390-400. 被引量:1
  • 2Ulrich Guller, Nitin Jain, Eric D. Peterson, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly[J]. Surgery, 2004,135(5):479-488. 被引量:1
  • 3Abdulzahra Hussain, Hind Mahmood, Tarun Singhal, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in a District hospital: does the technique in- fluence the uutcome[J]. Journal of laparoscnpic and advanced surgical techniques, 2008,18(2):204-208. 被引量:1
  • 4Goutaro Katsuno. Kunihiko Nagakari, Seiichiro Yoshikawa, et al. Laparoscopie appendectomy for eomplicated appendicitis: A comparison with open appendectomy[all. World Journal of Surgery, 2009,33 (2): 208-214. 被引量:1
  • 5Sanjeev Dutta. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the sear from abdominal operations[J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2009,44(9):1741-1745. 被引量:1
  • 6Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. l,aparoseopie appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy)[J]. J Reprod Med, 1992,37(7): 588-594. 被引量:1
  • 7Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecyslectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparalive study[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011,21 ( 1 ): 25-28. 被引量:1
  • 8Tian Y. Wu SD, Chen YS, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy using conventional instruments: the first lwo cases[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2010,14(9):1429-1433. 被引量:1
  • 9Ponsky LE, Ctlerullo EE, Sawyer M, et al. Single access site laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience[J]. J Endourol, 2008,22 (4):663-665. 被引量:1
  • 10Castelucci SA, Curcillo PG, Ginsburg PC, et al. Single port access adrenalectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2008,22(8):1573-1576. 被引量:1

同被引文献81

引证文献10

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部