期刊文献+

罗哌卡因等比重液用于剖腹产病人腰-硬联合阻滞的临床观察 被引量:1

Application of Isobaric Ropivacaine in Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Caesarean
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:罗哌卡因等比重液用于剖腹产腰-硬联合阻滞的安全性和有效性。方法:择期行剖腹产病人90例,ASA(Ⅰ~Ⅱ)级,随机分成3组,每组30例。用DurasafeTM型联合阻滞配套针于L2~3间隙穿刺。以0.1mL/s的速率蛛网膜下隙注入等比重混和局麻药3mL(B组:布比卡因7.5mg;R1组:罗哌卡因7.5mg;R2组:罗哌卡因10mg),术中酌情于硬膜外给予2%利多卡因维持麻醉。用针刺法测感觉阻滞平面,用改良Bromage法测运动阻滞程度。比较三组病人在感觉、运动阻滞及恢复方面的异同,记录麻醉各时点血压、心率变化,并观察用药后的不良反应。结果:三组均能提供较为完善的麻醉。R组的运动阻滞起效时间长于B组(P<0.01),运动阻滞恢复时间短于B组(P<0.01)。R1组感觉阻滞消退到S1~2时间、完全运动阻滞发生率明显少于B组(P<0.01)。结论:罗哌卡因等比重7.5mg腰-硬联合阻滞用于剖腹产病人是安全的,其循环和呼吸系统较稳定,未见严重并发症,并能达到较为完善的麻醉效果。 Objective:To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) for caesarean.Methods:Ninety women who were identified with ASA(I^II) were divided into randomLy three groups of 30 each;group B,R1 and R2 received 0.25% bupivacaine 7.5mg,0.25% ropivacaine 7.5mg and 0.33% ropivacaine 10mg respectively through L2~3space puncture,and the epidural anesthesia was maintained with 2% lidocaine if necessary during the operation.The level and duration of sensory anesthesia were recorded bilaterally by a pinprick test,and motor block in limb was assessed with a modified Bromage scale.Hemodynamic changes and side effects were observed after spinal anesthesia.Results: Three groups had perfect quality of anesthesia.As compared with group B,group R produced longer time to maximum motor block(P0.01) and shorter time to motor recession(P0.01);more than,group R1 expressed shorter time(S1~2) of sensory block and less motor lockage(P0.01).Conclusions:Application of 7.5mg rolivacaine is safe and effective;the circulating and respiratory system are stable and less complication in CSEA for caesarean.
作者 马骠
出处 《青海医药杂志》 2011年第9期8-10,共3页 Qinghai Medical Journal
关键词 罗哌卡因 布比卡因 等比重液 腰-硬联合阻滞 剖腹产病人 Roivacaine Bupivacaine Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia Caesarean
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Long BW, Rosenblums, Grady IP. Successful resuscittaation of bupuvacaine induced ca~iaca~st using cardiopulmary by- pass. Anesth Analg, 1989,69:403 -406. 被引量:1
  • 2Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, et al. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg, 1993,77:919 -924. 被引量:1
  • 3Kajikawa S, Suzuki M, Yokoi M. preoperative complications and intraoperative hemodynamie changes in very old patients with femoral neck fractures. Masui ,2000,49:995 - 999. 被引量:1
  • 4Cfitchley LA, Morley AP, Derrocl J. The influence of baricity on the hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5%. Anaesthesia, 1999,54:469 -474. 被引量:1
  • 5McClure JH, Ropivaeaine, Br J Anaesth, 1996,76:300 - 307. 被引量:1
  • 6HurfordW,BailinMT,DavisonJK,主编.ClinicalAnesthesiaProceduresoftheMasachusettsGeneralHospital.第5版.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1999,195. 被引量:1
  • 7Brockway MS, Bannister J, McClure JH, et al. Comparison of extradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1991, 66:31 - 37. 被引量:1
  • 8易杰,黄宇光,罗爱伦.罗哌卡因用于腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞的临床观察[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2000,20(1):26-28. 被引量:208
  • 9Rawal N, SchoUin J, Wesstrom G. Epidural versus combined spimal block for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1988,32:61. 被引量:1

二级参考文献1

  • 1刘俊杰,现代麻醉学(第2版),1997年,632页 被引量:1

共引文献207

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部