期刊文献+

技术进步对专利价值影响的实物期权分析 被引量:6

Real Option Valuation of the Patent under Competition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的专利价值评价方法没有考虑专利投资的实物期权价值,存在很大的缺陷,即低估专利的价值。目前用实物期权来评估专利价值的文献又没有考虑技术进步对专利价值的影响,从而高估专利的价值。为了准确评估专利的价值,本文将考虑技术进步对专利价值的影响,用跳-扩散过程来描述技术进步过程。通过介绍专利评估的实物期权方法,再对不考虑技术进步时专利评估的实物期权方法和存在技术进步时专利评估的实物期权方法进行详细的介绍,并对有竞争条件和无竞争条件下专利的实物期权价值进行比较,从而提高引入技术进步来评估专利价值的准确性。 Traditional methods of patent pricing do not consider real option valuation of the patent,leading to the undervaluation of the patents. However, now, the research that applies real option to patent pricing does not consider the impact of rivalry entry on the value of patent option, leading to the overvaluation of the patents. In order to price patents accurately, in considering the effect of rivalry entry on the value of patent option, a real option approach for patent pricing is proposed. This method is applied to analyze the patent pricing with technological progress considered and with technological progress not considered, respectively, for comparison. Also, with competition and without competition, the valuation of patent real option is analyzed. Results show that, in considering the technology progress, the proposed method can accurately price the value of patents.
作者 程夷 周焯华
出处 《工业工程》 北大核心 2011年第5期58-61,共4页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70371030)
关键词 专利 实物期权 竞争 patent real option competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1杨春鹏,伍海华.实物期权在专利权价值评估中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(6):101-104. 被引量:46
  • 2Lambrecht, Bart. Strategic sequential investment and sleep- ing patent[ M] //Michael J Brennan, Lenos Trigeorgis. Pro- ject flexiblity, agency and competition. New York: Oxford U- niversity Press ,2000. 被引量:1
  • 3Dixit Avinash K, Robert S Pindyck. Investment under Uncer- tainty [ M ]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 4Kester W C. An options approach to corporate finance [ M ] //Altman E I. Handbook of corporate finance. 2nd ed. New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1986. 被引量:1
  • 5Cox J, Ross S. The valuation of options for alternative sto- chastic processes [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976:3 (1), 145-166. 被引量:1
  • 6Mason S P, Merton R C. The rote of contingent claims ana- lysis in corporate finance [ M ]//Ahman E, Subrahamanyam M. Recent advances in corporate finance. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1985:7-54. 被引量:1
  • 7Myers C S. Determinants of corporate borrowing[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1977 (5) : 147-175. 被引量:1
  • 8Pindyck S R. Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm [ J ]. The American Economic Review, 1988,78 (5) :969-985. 被引量:1
  • 9Pindyck S R. Investments of uncertain costs [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics[ J], 1993 (34) :53-76. 被引量:1
  • 10Trigeorgis L. Real options and financial decision-making [J ]. Contemporary Finance Digest (FMA/CIBC World Markets) ,2000( 1 ) :5-42. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

  • 1丹尼斯·卡尔顿 杰弗里·佩罗夫.现代产业组织[M].三联书店,1997.330-404. 被引量:1
  • 2丹尼斯.卡尔顿 杰弗里.佩罗夫.现代产业组织[M].三联书店,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 3[1]Black F, Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Jour Polit Eco, 1973, 81:637-659. 被引量:1
  • 4[2]Hull J. Options Futures and Other Derivatives[M]. Prentice-Hall, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 5[3]Merton R C. Continuous-Time Finance[M]. Blackwell, Oxford, 1990. 被引量:1
  • 6[4]Merton R C. Theory of rational option pricing[J]. Bell J. Econom. Managen. Sci., 1973,4:141-183. 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Trigeorgis L. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation[M]. MIT, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 8[6]Trigeorgis L. Real Option[M]. MIT, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Hemantha S B, Chan S P. Economic analysis of R&D projects: an options approach[J]. The Engineering Economist, 1999,44(1):1-35. 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. The option approach to capital investment[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995, (5,6):105-115. 被引量:1

共引文献258

同被引文献180

引证文献6

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部