摘要
目的比较闭合复位外固定支架与切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效及并发症。方法回顾性分析手术治疗桡骨远端骨折89例的临床资料。36例采用闭合复位外固定支架(CREF组)治疗;53例采用切开复位内固定(ORIF组)治疗。比较两组治疗结果的优良率和并发症的发生率。结果 89例患者均获随访6～24个月。CREF组住院时间、手术时间及骨折愈合时间均较ORIF组缩短(P<0.05)。CREF组的优良率为94.44%,高于ORIF组的73.58%(P<0.05);CREF组并发症发生率为2.78%,低于ORIF组的16.98%(P<0.05)。结论采用CREF治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效优于ORIF。
Objective To compare the efficacy and complication in treating distal radius fractures with the close reduction with external fixation（CREF） and open reduction with internal fixation（ORIF）.Methods A total of 89 patients with distal radius fractures received CREF in 36 cases（group CREF） and ORIF in 53 cases（group ORIF）.The effectiveness rate of clinical results and incidence of complications were compared between two groups.Results All patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months.The hospital stay,operation time and healing time were all shorter in group CREF than those in group ORIF（P〈0.05）.The excellent rate was higher in group CREF than that in group ORIF（94.44% vs.73.58%）（P〈0.05）.The incidence rate of complication was lower in group CREF than that in group ORIF（2.78% vs.16.98%）（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The efficacy of treating distal radius fractures with CREF is better than that with ORIF.
出处
《江苏医药》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第20期2417-2419,共3页
Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词
桡骨远端骨折
外固定
闭合复位
Distal radius fracture
External fixation
Close reduction
