摘要
朱熹以天理论王道,认为王霸之别就是天理人欲之异,为王道政治寻找到理本论的依据,强调仁义原则的优先性,体现出强烈的现实批判立场。而陈亮则在对王道所体现的道义原则有所肯认的基础上,认为霸道亦有体现仁政处,霸者的伟业也是仁心之发现,霸固本于王。这与他们当时政治关注点的不同有一定关系。但朱熹的王霸论在具体理论的阐述上,偏离其原始初衷,转向空谈性命义理,部分地抹杀了其真正价值所在;而陈亮对汉唐君主事功事能的赞美,从思想逻辑的推衍来看,则会导向道义维度的缺失。
Zhu Xi and Chen Liang＇ s Debate on Kingly Way and Dictator＇ s Way highly reflects their basic views. The difference between their theories is relevant with their different focuses on contemporary politics. However, Zhu xi deviated from his original idea to vacant theory of nature, mandate and principle in his detailed illustration and lost the true value of it. Chen Liang＇ s praise on the contribution and capacities of the Han and Tangs＇ emperors will due to lost his principle of moral justice, according to the logic reasoning of his thoughts.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第11期131-135,共5页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
朱熹
陈亮
王道
霸道
王霸之辨
Zhu Xi
Chen Liang
Kingly Way
Dictator＇ s Way
