期刊文献+

急诊冠脉介入治疗高龄急性心肌梗死患者的临床特征和预后 被引量:6

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients older than 75 years old with acute myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析75岁以上高龄ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(STEM I)急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PC I)患者住院期间的临床特征和术后12个月的随访结果。方法回顾性分析2005年3月至2010年3月,实行急诊PC I术的STEM I患者297例,年龄(59.33±11.42)岁,将高龄组(≥75岁)患者49例的临床特征、治疗结果和预后与对照组(<75岁)患者进行对比。结果高龄组患者占16.5%,年龄(77.46±2.37)岁,其中女性患者比例高于对照组(34.7%比19.8%,P<0.05)。高龄患者既往陈旧心梗、卒中较对照组多,分别是(18.3%比7.7%;30.6%比10.8%;P<0.05);其缺血时间较对照组长(4.66±2.49)h比(3.76±2.05)h,左室射血分数低(52.88±6.70)%比(55.66±7.51)%,P<0.01;高龄组冠脉介入手术成功率、并发症发生率与对照组差异无统计学意义,分别是(93.9%比97.2%,4.1%比2.0%),P>0.05;高龄组患者病变复杂,三支血管病变、术中再灌注心律失常发生率高于对照组,分别为(38.7%比23.5%;44.8%比28.6%,P<0.05)。住院期间和术后12个月两组患者在死亡、再梗死、卒中及靶血管重建率方面差异无统计学意义,术后12个月高龄组总体MACE高于对照组(22.4%比7.2%),P<0.05。结论尽管高龄组患者术后12个月的总体MACE高于对照组,但在手术成功率、并发症发生率、死亡、再梗死、卒中及靶血管重建率方面相似,急诊PC I是年龄≥75岁的高龄STEM I患者安全、有效的再灌注治疗策略。 Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in patients ≥75 years old with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction(STEMI) during hospitalization and after 12 months.Methods A retrospective analysis of 297 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI admitted between March 2005 to March 2010(mean age 59.33 ± 11.42 years) was done.The clinical characteristics,treatment results and prognosis of the elderly group(≥75 years,n=49) were compared with the control group(n=248).Results The elderly group accounted for 16.5% of patients with mean age(77.46±2.37) years.The elderly group consisted more female patients than in the controls(34.7% vs.19.8%,P0.05).Elderly patients were more frequently to have old myocardial infarction and stroke(18.3% vs.7.7%;30.6% vs.10.8%;P0.05,respectively);as well as long ischemic time(4.66±2.49) h vs.(3.76±2.05) h,and low LVEF(52.88±6.70)% vs.(55.66±7.51)%,P0.01.Coronary intervention success rate of the elderly group compared with the control was(93.9% vs.97.2%,P0.05) and complication rate was(4.1% vs.2.0%,P0.05).Complex lesions,multi-vessel disease,reperfusion arrhythmias of the elderly group was much higher than the control group(38.7% vs.23.5 %;44.8% vs.28.6%,P0.05,respectively).The incidence of in-hospital death and death after 12 months,reinfarction,stroke,target vessel revascularization respectively were similar in both groups.Overall MACE increased in the elderly group after 12-month(22.4% vs.7.2%;P 0.05).Conclusions Although incidence of elderly group in overall MACE after 12 months was higher,the success rate of surgery,complication rate,death,reinfarction,stroke,target vessel revascularization respectively were similar in both group.Primary PCI is a safe and effective strategy for reperfusion therapy in elderly patients.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2011年第5期257-260,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 发病年龄 心肌梗死 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 预后 Age of onset Myocardial infarction Angioplasty transluminal percutaneous coronary Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1de Boer MJ,Ottervanger JP, van't Hof AW, et al. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: arandomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coil Cardiol,2002,39: 1723-1728. 被引量:1
  • 2Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytie therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet ,2003,361 : 13-20. 被引量:1
  • 3Boersma Eand Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs. Thrombolysis Does time matter? A pooled analysis of clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibfinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J,2006,27: 779-788. 被引量:1
  • 4Rosengren A,Spetz CL, K~stner M, et al. Sex differences in survival after myocardial infarction in Sweden; data from the Swedish National Acute Myocardial Infarction Register. Eur Heart J, 2001,22 : 314-322. 被引量:1
  • 5Mehta RH, Granger CB, Alexander KP, et al. Reperfusion strategies for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2005,45:471-478. 被引量:1
  • 6Devlin G, Gore JM, Elliott J, et al. GRACE Investigators. Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome : The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J, 2008,29 : 1275-1282. 被引量:1
  • 7Ogawa H, Kojima S. Modern state of acute myocardial infarction in the interventional era: observational case-control study- Japanese acute coronary syndrome study (JACSS). J Cardiol, 2009,54 : 1-9. 被引量:1
  • 8de Boer M J, Ottervanger JP, Suryapranata H, et al. Old age and outcome after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010,58:867-872. 被引量:1
  • 9Kashima K, Ikeda D, Tanaka H,et al. Mid-term mortality of very elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction with or without coronary intervention. J Cardiol,2010, 55:397-403. 被引量:1
  • 10Ciszewski A, Karcz M, Kepka C, et aI. Primary angioplasty in patients 1>= 75 years old with ST-elevation myocardial infarction one-year follow-up results. Kardiol Pol, 2008,66:828-833. 被引量:1

同被引文献51

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部