期刊文献+

美国大学教师学术自由保护原则的司法考量

Discuss of Establishment of the Protection Principle on Academic Freedom of American University Teachers from the Judicial Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在美国,学术自由具有一定的法律意义,学术自由保护原则的确立主要来自于法院对学术自由案件判决的逻辑关系。美国大学教师的学术自由权利主要涉及到以下几个方面:学术行为的保护性——维护大学教师公民身份的自由;学术评价的公正性——捍卫大学教师平等对待的权利;学术成果的保密性——保护大学教师科学研究的自由。学术自由保护原则最终通过权衡控诉双方的利益得以实现。 In the American,the academic freedom has some legal significance,the establishment of the protect principle of academic freedom primarily from the logic of relations that the court decisions on the academic freedom cases.The academic freedom rights of American University's teachers mainly related to the following aspects: the protection of academic behavior-to maintain the freedom of university teachers citizenship;the fairness of academic evaluation-to defend the right to equal treatment of university teachers;the confidentiality of academic achievements-protect the freedom of scientific research of university teachers.The protect principle of academic freedom can be achieved by the trade-offs on the both interests of accuses ultimately.
作者 崔吉义 张宇
出处 《煤炭高等教育》 2011年第5期83-86,共4页 Meitan Higher Education
关键词 美国大学教师 学术自由 保护原则 American university teachers academic freedom protection principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Kaplin, William A. The law Comprehensive Guide to of higher education: A Legal Implications of Administrative Decision Making [M ]. San Francisco Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1978:328-331,310,331- 337,337 343. 被引量:1
  • 2Pyrne, Peter J. Academic Freedom: A Special Concern of the First Amendment[J].the Yale Law Journal, Vol. 99, No. 2 (Nov. ,1989), 251-340. 被引量:1
  • 3The mission of the EEOC, as set forth in its strategic plan, is to promote equal opportunity in employment through administrative and judicial enforcement of the federal civil rights laws and through education and technical assistance [EB/OL]. [2011-04-21]. http://ias, cass. cn/ZTK/show __ ZTK. asp? id=30183. 被引量:1
  • 4Kent M. Weeks. The Peer Review Process: Confidentiality and Disclosure[J]. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Mar. --Apr. ,1990) ,198-219. 被引量:1
  • 5Cobb, Joseph J. An Introduction to Educational Law: for Administrators and Teachers[M]. Springfield, Ill : Thomas, 1981:134,20,134-135,135,135. 被引量:1
  • 6George W. Angell. Management prerogatives and faculty rights[J]. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 49, No. 3 (May-Jun. ,1978),283-293. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部