摘要
目的 探讨专家飞行员和新手飞行员注意返回抑制容量的差异.方法 采用同时线索化方式,通过实验比较10名专家飞行员和10名新手飞行员在线索化位置相邻与间隔条件下的返同抑制容量.结果在同时线索化条件下,无论线索化位置是相邻还是间隔的,专家飞行员的反应时[相邻：（428.01±64.89） ms,间隔：（425.24±63.94） ms]均长于新手飞员的反应时[相邻：（363.05±38.95） ms,间隔：（360.61±41.70）ms],差异具有显著性（P＜0.01）；在返回抑制容量方面,无论线索化位置是相邻还是间隔的,专家飞行员仅在同时线索化位置为5个时出现返回抑制（P＜0.05）,其他位置数目差异均不显著；新手飞行员在同时线索化位置为3～5个时均出现返回抑制,其差异极其显著（P＜0.0l）.结论 专家飞行员的返回抑制容量稳定性比新手飞行员好,表现出稳定的、高效率的空间搜索能力.
Objective To investigate the differences in the inhibition of return （IOR） capacity of attention between expert and novice pilots.Methods Compared the capacity of IOR of 10 expert pilots and 10 novice pilots under the conditions of adjacent and spaced clueing positions by experiment and by means of simultaneous cueing processes.Results These data suggested that in simultaneous cueing processes,no matter that the clueing positions were adjacent or spaced,the reaction time of expert pilots（ adjacent：（428.01 ± 64.89） ms,spaced：（425.24 ± 63.94 ） ms） was slower novice pilots （ adjacent：（ 363.05 ± 38.95 ） ms,spaced：（ 360.61 ± 41.70 ） ms ）（P 〈 0.01 ） ; the capacity of IOR in no matter that the clueing positions were adjacent or spaced.The expert pilots showed IOR at only one location when the 5 clues all appearance in simultaneous cueing processes （P〈 0.05 ）,and no IOR could be see in the other locations.The novice pilots showed IOR when the from 3 to 5 of clues appearance in simultaneous cueing processes,the disparity was significantly predominance（P〈 0.01 ）.Conclusion The expert pilots of stability of capacity of IOR is better than novice pilots,and show solidly and highly efficient space searching ability.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第10期932-934,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词
飞行员
注意
返回抑制容量
同时线索化
Pilot
Attention
Capacity of inhibition of return
Simultaneous cueing
