摘要
目的探讨出血性中风中经络、中脏腑客观指标的差异。方法临床观察270例出血性中风患者,分为中经络组、中脏腑组,比较相关实验室指标、颅脑CT表现的不同。结果中经络组与中脏腑组的血脂、凝血功能、血液流变学指标,除低密度脂蛋白(P<0.01)外,均无统计学差异;基底节区、丘脑为脑出血中脏腑的好发部位;中经络组脑出血量多小于30mL,平均(12.79±11.06)mL;中脏腑组脑出血量多大于30mL,平均(32.42±24.45)mL,明显大于中经络组(P<0.01)。结论中经络组、中脏腑组实验室指标无明显差异,中脏腑组出血量明显大于中经络组。
OBJECTIVE To explore the differences between objective indicators regarding hemorrhagic stroke involving the viscera and meridians.METHODS 270 patients were selected and divided into meridians group and viscera group to observe differences in the related laboratory indexes,brain CT performance.RESULTS Indicators including blood fat,coagulation function and hemorheology showed significant differences except LDL（P0.01）;basal ganglia region and cerebral ganglion were the place where the predilection sites for hemorrhagic stroke involving the viscera;bleeding amount of hemorrhagic stroke involving the meridians were less than 30 mL（（12.79±11.06） mL on average） and bleeding amount of hemorrhagic stroke involving the viscera were more than 30 mL（（32.42±24.45） mL overage）,with significant differences（P0.01）.CONCLUSION There is no significant difference in laboratory indexes;the bleeding amount of viscera group is obviously larger than that of meridian group.
出处
《南京中医药大学学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第5期421-423,共3页
Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)课题(2006CB504807)
关键词
出血性中风
中经络
中脏腑
实验室指标
颅脑CT
hemorrhagic stroke
hemorrhagic stroke involving the viscera
hemorrhagic stroke involving the meridians
laboratory indexes
brain CT
