摘要
目的分析比较不同采集方法制备的木香挥发性成分。方法分别采用水蒸气蒸馏法和顶空加热提取挥发性成分的方法,对其进行气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)结合保留指数双重定性。结果可鉴定出顶空进样的木香中42个挥发性化学成分;可鉴定出水蒸气蒸馏法提取的32个挥发性化学成分;两种采样方法进行的GC-MS分析,有14种相同化合物,但相对含量有一定差异。结论两种采样方法,分别提供了木香中不同沸点的挥发性成分的化学信息;运用这两种方法可以建立更全面的木香挥发性成分GC-MS表征体系。
OBJECTIVE To compare the difference of volatile compounds in Radix Aucklandiae treated with different sample acquisition methods.METHODS Using steam distillation and head-space injection respectively,volatile components in Radix Aucklandiae were analyzed by GC-MS combined with Kovats retention index.RESULTS By GC-MS,42 volatile compounds in Radix Aucklandiae treated with head-space injection were identified,whereas 32 volatile compounds in volatile oil which obtained by steam distillation were identified.Among the detected compounds in the samples treated with different methods,there were 14 mutual compounds with different relative contents.CONCLUSION The above two sample acquisition methods are focusing on volatile compounds with different boiling points;analyzing the herb treated with the above two methods respectively is feasible to establish GC-MS representation system for Radix Aucklandiae.
出处
《中国现代应用药学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第10期931-934,共4页
Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
基金
国家"973"计划项目(2007CB512601)
