摘要
在经学原典的基础上,在融会三教、复兴儒学的时代呼唤下,北宋儒家学者吸收佛、道之说,深述性命义理,逐渐建构起形而上的新儒学。与此同时,以欧阳修、司马光、苏轼、苏辙为代表,对性命学展开了激烈的批判。他们的非性命学基于排斥佛老、重振纲常,崇实黜虚、提倡实学,批判王安石变法而立论,先见性地揭示了性命学空谈不实之弊。随着性命学成为时代风尚,他们又向性命学方向转变,以自己独特的性命之学来批判现有性命学的不足,显示出学术发展的多元化,更折射出学术发展的曲折与必然。
On the basis of Confucian Classics,scholars in Northern Song dynasty absorbed the useful parts of Buddhism and Taoism,and founded Neo-Confucianism for human nature and destiny learning.At the same time,scholars such as Ouyang xiu,Sima guang,Su Shi and Su Zhe criticized it.However,with the development and wide spread of human nature and destiny learning,these scholars transformed to expound their own human nature and destiny learning.All of these meant that the development of the learning of Song Dynasty was not smooth.
出处
《西华师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2011年第5期62-68,共7页
Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
关键词
性命学
欧阳修
司马光
苏轼
苏辙
human nature and destiny learning
Ouyang Xiu
Sima Guang
Su Shi
Su Zhe
