摘要
美国联邦机动车安全标准(FMVSS)和213法规和欧洲经济委员会(ECE)的R44法规是国际上被普遍采用的儿童乘车安全保护法规。该文对比了ECER44和FMVSS213,并参照了相关文献。分析结果表明:ECER44在试验工况、儿童损伤指标评价、儿童座椅固定方式等方面要优于FMVSS213;在儿童假人的使用方面FMVSS213要优于ECER44。因此,中国在制定机动车儿童乘员法规时,建议以ECER44法规为主,并加入FMVSS213的优势部分;儿童安全保护的研究方向是:儿童损伤生物力学,儿童假人的改进,儿童安全带位置及假人姿态的控制。
Regulations such as FMVSS 213 in the USA and ECE R44 in Europe have been widely used for child passenger safety. These two regulations and other relevant references were analyzed and compared, which shows that ECE R44 is superior to FMVSS 213 in test conditions, child injury criteria, and fixed forms of child restraint systems, and is inferior to FMVSS 213 in child dummies used at present. When stipulating Chinese regulations for child passenger safety, ECE R44 should be focused with the advantages of FMVSS 213 also included. Therefore, the future research in child passenger safety should include the child injury biomechanics, child dummy improvement, seatbelt position determination, and dummy posture control.
出处
《汽车安全与节能学报》
CAS
2011年第3期185-191,共7页
Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy
