摘要
定性盗窃须依据实体标准,《刑法修正案(八)》扩大盗窃犯罪圈却有收紧制裁圈之效;司法解释虽在立法基础上具体定性规则,数额的经年不变却可能令犯罪圈隐性扩张;为此,个案情节的适用能够起到内敛犯罪圈的作用。定性盗窃还须经程序控制,因为出罪案件未经刑事诉讼程序的过滤,相关立法及司法解释之疏漏可能被遮蔽,因动机、赔偿情节豁免出罪的理由可能不甚清晰。
Conviction of theft shall be based on substantial criteria.The Amendment 8 to the Criminal Act,while increasing certain theft crimes, has the effect of narrowing the scope of sanctions.Though the Judicial Interpretations have offered specific qualitative rules for conviction of theft,the fact that the amount of the value of the property involved in the conviction kept unchanged for years might broaden the scope of punishment.Thus,taking into account of some specific cases might decrease the size of theft crime circle.Moreover,it is best that theft conviction be controlled with procedural means for if the accused is acquitted without undergoing criminal proceedings, relevant defects of legislation or judicial interpretations might be ignored.And acquittal merely based on motivation or active compensation might not be justified.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期97-105,共9页
Modern Law Science
关键词
盗窃
犯罪圈
实体标准
程序控制
theft
crime circle
substantial standard
procedural control