摘要
数学易缪性是对传统数学真理观的挑战。皮尔士和拉卡托斯虽然都提出了数学的易缪性,但二者对于数学易缪性的理解并不一致。文章从三个方面即数学易缪性的提出、数学易缪性的根据和对数学易缪性的信心介绍了皮尔士和拉卡托斯的数学易缪性,在此基础上对二者的数学易缪性进行了比较。
The mathematics fallibilism is a challenge to the views of the traditional mathematics truths. Although both Charles Sanders Peirce and Imre Lakatos put forward the mathematics fallibilism, their understandings to the mathematics fallibilism were different. This paper introduces Peirce and Lakatos＇ mathematics fallibilism from three aspects which are the mathematics fallibilism＇ s presenting, its justification, and the confidence to it. In the end, their views on mathematics fallibilism are compared.
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第5期48-51,共4页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词
皮尔士
拉卡托斯
数学易缪性
比较
Peirce
Lakatos
mathematics fallibilism
comparison
