摘要
目的比较开环式微创痔吻合术(TST)及吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔的疗效。方法 100例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔患者分成观察组和对照组,对照组采用PPH术,观察组采用TST术。结果观察组脱垂率、出血消失率、直肠静息压及肛管静息压与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组手术时间、住院时间、出血量均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TST治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔病是一种比较可靠的治疗方法,而且副作用较小。
Objective To compare the surgical procedures of tissue-selecting therapy stapler （TST） and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） in treatment of 11I , 1V degrees hemorrhoids. Methods One hundred patients with III , IV degrees hemorrhoids were divided into observation group and control group. Control group received PPH and observation group received TST. Results Prolapse, bleeding disappearance rate, rectum resting pressure and anal canal resting pressure of the observation group compared with control group, the difference was not significant （P 〉 0.05）. The operation time, time of hospitalization and blood loss of observation group were less than those of control group, and there were significant differences （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion TST in treatment of m, IV degrees hemorrhoids has good efficacy.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2011年第25期59-60,共2页
China Modern Doctor
关键词
开环式微创痔吻合术
吻合器痔上黏膜环切术
痔
直肠静息压
肛管静息压
Tissue-selecting therapy stapler
Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids
Hemorrhoid
Rectum resting pressure
Analcanal resting pressur
