摘要
目的探讨新型BISAP评分体系（bedside index for severity in AP）对重症急性胰腺炎（SAP）的评估价值。方法选取临床拟诊为SAP的患者68例，分别进行BISAP、APACHEII、Ranson以及CTSI评分。BISAP评分标准包括患者入院24h内的尿素氮水平、受损精神状态、全身炎症反应综合征、年龄、胸腔积液5项内容。以BISAP≥3分、APACHEⅡ〉8分、Ranson≥3分、CTSⅡ〉3分为SAP的评估标准，分析这几种评分系统评估SAP的正确率。结果68例患者中，BISAP≥3分者43例，占63．2％；APACHEⅡ≥8分者41例，占60．3％；Ranson≥3分者41例，占60．3％；CTSI≥3分者46例，占67．6％。BISAP评分系统与APACHEⅡ评分系统、Ranson评分系统以及CTSI评分系统比较，评估SAP的正确率均无显著性统计学差异。结论BISAP评分系统作为一种新型的、简便的评分体系可推广应用于SAP的评估。
Objective To evaluate the value of the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis （BISAP） in diagnosing severe acute pancreatitis. Methods Sixty-eight patients with suspected diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis were collected and were scored by BISAP, APACHE Ⅱ , Ranson and CTSI scoring systems, respectively. BISAP scoring system included the blood urea nitrogen, impaired mental status, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, age, and pleural effusion. The diagnosis criteria of severe acute pancreatitis was BISAP I〉 3 points or APACHE Ⅱ ≥ 8 points, Ranson ≥ 3 points, CTSI≥ 3 points. The diagnostic accuracy of SAP of these scoring systems was calculated. Results Among these 68 cases, 63.2% （43/68） were graded ≥ 3 points in BISAP scoring system;60.3% （41/68） were marked t〉 8 points in APACHE Ⅱ scoring system; 60.3% （41/68） were scored ≥1 3 points in Ranson scoring system; and 67.6% （46/68） were scored ≥ 3 points in CTSI scoring system. There was no statistical difference between BISAP scoring system and other three scoring systems in diagnosing severe acute pancreatitis. Conclusions As a new and simple scoring system, BISAP scoring system can be widely used in the diagnosis of severe acute oancreatitis.
出处
《中华胰腺病杂志》
CAS
2011年第4期231-233,共3页
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
