摘要
目的比较DHS与PFN内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床效果及并发症。方法 120例锁股骨转子间骨折患者作为研究对象,被随机分为实验组和对照组,对照组给予动力髋螺钉(DHS)治疗,实验组给予股骨近端带锁髓内钉(PFN)治疗。结果 2组优良率无显著性差异(χ2=0.835,P>0.05),但实验组愈合时间(t=2.673,P<0.05)和总并发症率(χ2=5.841,P<0.05)均显著少于对照组。结论股骨近端带锁髓内钉(PFN)应用于股骨转子间骨折患者,具有较好的临床效果,而且可以显著降低术后并发症,值得临床应用推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effect and complications of dynamic hip screw（DHS） and proximal femoral nail （PFN） used for patients with intertrochanteric fracture.Methods 120 cases of patients with intertrochanteric fracture as studied object were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, control group was given surgery of DHS,and experimental group was given surgery of PFN.Results The good rate（x^2=0.835,P〉0.05） between two groups had no significant difference. The healing time（t=2.673,P〈0.05） and complications rate（x^2=5.841,P〈0.05） in experimental group was significantly less than that in control group.Conclusion PFN used for patients with intertrochanteric fracture can enhance surgery effect and decrease complications,so it deserved applying in clinical work.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2011年第04Z期6-7,共2页
China Health Industry
