摘要
目的通过对比蜂蜜及正压给氧辅助治疗感染性伤口的临床效果及可操作性,寻求一种效果良好、简便易行、经济适用、患者容易接受的治疗方法。方法将52例感染性伤口患者按性别、年龄、营养状况、伤口分类、感染及创伤程度分为试验组和对照组各26例,常规清创后对照组通过正压给氧装置向伤口给氧0.5～1小时,试验组创腔内放入蜂蜜并引流。结果换药次数、愈合时间及治疗效果,两组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 对感染性伤口用蜂蜜换药辅助治疗是一种切实可行的方法,效果良好,简便易行,经济适用。
Objective To seek a treatment with good effect,simple operation,which is affordable and easy to accept through comparing the clinical effect and maneuverability of honey and positive pressure oxygen auxiliary treatment in infectious wound.Methods Fifty-two cases with wound infection were randomly divided into trial group and control group.Twenty-six cases in control group were given oxygen for 0.5~1 hour through positive pressure oxygen device after conventional debridement and dressing change,while the 26 cases in trial group were given honey after debridement and drainage.Results The dressing change frequency,healing time and treatment effect in two groups were significantly different（P0.01）.Conclusions It is a feasible,effective,simple and economical method to use honey in infectious wound.
出处
《实用医院临床杂志》
2011年第5期137-138,共2页
Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词
伤口
感染
蜂蜜
换药
临床效果
Wound
Infection
Honey
Dressing change
Clinical effect
