摘要
方苞和姚鼐都是桐城派的重要作家,在他们的文集中都有一部分游记。方苞的游记重在对义理的揭示,而姚鼐的游记则融合了考据。究其因,主要与二人所处时代的学术风气有关。不同的时代,不同的学术氛围,造就了他们不同的文学观,从而使他们的游记也各具特色,各有千秋。
Both Fang Ban and Yao Nai are vital writers of Tongcheng School, there are some travels in their corpus, Fang Bao pay more intention to argumentation when in creation, while Yao Nai fuses textual criticism in his travels. If we probe into the question, it＇s mainly because they lived in different academic atmospheres. Different times, different academic atmospheres, so their literary views is different, which make their travels distinct.
出处
《安康学院学报》
2011年第4期63-65,共3页
Journal of Ankang University
关键词
方苞
姚鼐
游记
义理
考据
学术风气
Fang Bao
YaoNai
travel-writing
argumentation
textual research
academic atmosphere
