期刊文献+

基于批发价格契约的质量成本审查模型分析 被引量:8

Analysis of quality cost audit model based on wholesale price contract
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了供应链中上下游企业间关于质量成本信息的不对称现象,并由此可能产生的谎报问题.建立了以批发价格契约为基础,同时引入第三方质量成本审查策略的契约机制.结果表明:新的契约形式不但可以消除不对称信息的影响,而且通过审查策略对谎报质量成本信息现象进行了有效的抑制.下游企业可以通过合理的提高批发价格,激励上游企业增加质量成本投入,得到相应较高质量水平的产品,对生产有正向激励作用.最后通过算例验证了相关结论. In this paper,the asymmetric information between enterprises in supply chain and the resulting effect of cheating on quality cost are studied.Based on wholesale price contract a stylized contract menu is presented using third party quality cost audit strategy to establish an effective incentive mechanism.The conclusions demonstrate that the new contract can not only eliminate the effect of asymmetric quality cost information but also restrain the upstream enterprise from cheating on the quality cost.The downstream enterprise can improve quality level by raising wholesale price reasonably to incent the upstream enterprise to invest more on quality cost in the new contract.A numerical study is given to demonstrate the conclusions of the paper.
作者 张煜 汪寿阳
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期1481-1488,共8页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70731003)
关键词 供应链 批发价格契约 质量成本 审查 不对称信息 supply chain wholesale price contract quality cost audit asymmetric information
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Choi T Y, Hartley J L. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1996, 14:333-343. 被引量:1
  • 2Reyniers D, Tapiero C. The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(10): 1581-1589. 被引量:1
  • 3Lira W S. Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(5): 709-715. 被引量:1
  • 4Starbird S. Penalties, rewards and inspection: Provisions for quality in supply chain contracts[J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 2001, 52:109-115. 被引量:1
  • 5Baiman S, Fischer P, Rajan M. Information, contracting and quality costs[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(6): 776-789. 被引量:1
  • 6Baiman S, Fischer P, Rajah M. Performance measurement and design in supply chains[J]. Management Science, 2001.47(1): 173-188. 被引量:1
  • 7Hwang I, Radhakrishnan S, Lixin S. Vendor certication and appraisal: Implications for supplier quality[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(10): 1472-1482. 被引量:1
  • 8Balachandran K, Radhakrishnan S. Quality implication of warranties in a supply chain[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51: 1266-1277. 被引量:1
  • 9Zhu K, Zhang R, Tsung F. Pushing quality improvement along supply chains[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(3): 421-436. 被引量:1
  • 10Kaya M, Ozer O. Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost informa- tion[R]. Stanford University Working Paper, 2004. 被引量:1

二级参考文献82

  • 1陈志祥,马士华,陈荣秋.供应链环境下企业合作对策与委托-代理机制初探[J].管理工程学报,2001,15(1):75-76. 被引量:22
  • 2张钦红,赵泉午,熊中楷.不对称信息下的易逝品退货物流协调运作研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(2):107-111. 被引量:12
  • 3科斯 哈特 等.契约经济学[M].经济科学出版社,1999,1.. 被引量:48
  • 4张广海 孙静.现代质量管理学[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1999.2—6. 被引量:2
  • 5Starbird S A. Penalties, rewards and inspection: provisions for quality in supply chain contracts [ J ]. Journal of Operational Research Society, 2001,52(1):109-115. 被引量:1
  • 6Tayur S, Magazine M, Ganeshan R. Quantitative models for supply chain management [ M ]. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. 299 - 336. 被引量:1
  • 7Starbird S. The effect of acceptance sampling and risk aversion on the quality delivered by suppliers[J]. Journal of Operational Research Society, 1994,45(2) :309 - 320. 被引量:1
  • 8Cheng T. EPQ with process capability and quality assurance considerations[J ]. Journal of Operational Research Society,1991.42(4) :713 - 720. 被引量:1
  • 9Reyniers D, Tapiero C. The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts[J]. Management Science, 1995,41(8) : 1581 - 1589. 被引量:1
  • 10Corbet C J, Groote X D. A supplier's optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information [ J ].Management Science, 2000,46(3) :445 - 450. 被引量:1

共引文献139

同被引文献97

  • 1高充彦,贾建民.顾客满意度不确定性对服务质量评价的影响[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(2):39-47. 被引量:37
  • 2谭珊颖.企业食品安全自我规制机制探讨——基于实证的分析[J].学术论坛,2007,30(7):90-95. 被引量:12
  • 3雷敏,王希.中国饭店协会:已评定700多家绿色饭店和餐饮企业[J/OL].2010-10-02.http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-10/02/content1714940.htm. 被引量:2
  • 4Wu Z H,Pagell M.Balancing priorities:Decisionmaking in sustainable supply chain management[J].Journal of Operations Management,2011,29(10):577-590. 被引量:1
  • 5Vincen Y H.Assessing the greenness effort for European firms:A resource efficiency perspective[J].Management Decision,2009,47 (7):99-109. 被引量:1
  • 6Akerlof G A.The market for "lemons":Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970,84(3):488-500. 被引量:1
  • 7Gifford E J M.Effective shareholder engagement:The factors that contribute to shareholder salience[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2010,92 (4):79-97. 被引量:1
  • 8Klein B,Leffler K.The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance[J].Journal of Political Economy,1981,89(4):615-641. 被引量:1
  • 9Erdem T,Keane M P,Sun B.A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality[J].Marketing Science,2008,27(6):1111-1125. 被引量:1
  • 10Galor E.Warranties as a signal of quality[J].Canadian Journal of Economics,1989,22 (1):50-61. 被引量:1

引证文献8

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部