摘要
本文结合当今一些规范性语文工具书对异形词"执著"和"执着"的处理意见、这组异形词的历史渊源及目前使用情况进行了梳理和考察,发现"执著"和"执着"等异形词依然"我行我素",辞书和词表处理意见不一致甚或相反。本文以为仅有以往的处理原则尚嫌不够,还应进行大量个案研究,逐一定"形",由国家公布取舍结果,辞书或词表乃至各类教材保持高度一致,或可奏效。
This paper explores the methods and views of how reference books deal with the homophone ＂执着＂ and ＂执著＂,as well as the historical findings and current usage of this homophone.Thus,this paper concludes that many homophones including ＂执着＂ and ＂执著＂ have yet to be standardized.Many reference books,like the dictionaries and glossary,still hold opposing views on the standardization of the homophone.As the past findings seem to be unelaborated,this paper proposes an extensive case researches to work out the ＂standard form＂ of homophones.It also appeals to the country to acknowledge the ＂standard form＂,as well as to use it unanimously in dictionaries,glossaries and textbooks.
出处
《语言文字应用》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期102-109,共8页
Applied Linguistics
关键词
语文工具书
一致性
异形词
规范
reference books
consistency
homophone
standardization
