摘要
专利政策目标的三元论或二元论导致价值分裂和政策目标不统一,给法律适用带来困难。专利权既不是自然权利,也不是人权,专利权保护本身只具有工具价值。现代专利理论认为专利制度的目的在于激励创新而不是激励发明,现代经济增长理论主张国家积极干预创新,因此专利政策应当以"激励创新"作为惟一目标。考虑到专利政策的国际格局,我国专利制度的政策目标应当是"激励本国创新",专利授权、确权政策和司法政策都应与此目标相符。
Tri - purpose or dual - purpose theory of patent policy lead to values divergence and policies disunity, and brought difficulties to law enforcing activities. Patents are neither natural right nor human right, and the patent protection has just instrumentalist value. Modern patent theory advocates that patents are an incentive to innovate instead of an incentive to invent. Modern economic growth theory proposes that governments should actively interfere with innovation activities. Diverse patent policy purposes should be unified as incentive to innovate. In perspective of international situation, the purpose of our patent system is the incentive to innovate on our own, and concrete patent granting and confirming policies as well as enforcing policies should be in line with this purpose.
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第8期1155-1164,共10页
Studies in Science of Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJA820003)
关键词
专利政策目标
利益平衡
激励创新
专利授权与确权政策
专利司法政策
purpose of patent policy
balance of interests
incentive to innovate
patent granting and confirming policy
patent enforcing policy
