期刊文献+

前提可撤销性的认知分析

A Cognitive Study of the Defeasibility of Presupposition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知语言学中的框架理论和图形——背景理论可以作为探讨前提可撤销性问题的理论依据。前提可以视为交际中的背景部分,而声言则属于交际中的凸显部分。把"否定分析法"作为区别前提和蕴含的唯一方法的做法是片面的。否定应当区别对待,同一认知框架内的否定能使前提得以保留,而不同框架之间的否定会导致前提的撤销。 By taking the frame theory and figure - ground image schema in cognitive linguistics as its rationale, this paper discusses the defeasibility of presupposition, a quite complex problem in presupposition studies. Presupposition can be regarded as the background in communication, while assertion is taken to be the profiled part. It is one -sided to take "Negation Approach" as the only way to distinguish presupposition and entailment. Negation should be cut into two parts: within - frame negation, which can maintain the presupposition; and cross - frame negation, which will cancel the presupposition.
作者 刘智慧
出处 《湖南财政经济学院学报》 2011年第4期152-156,共5页 Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics
基金 湖南省教育厅科研项目"前提的认知语用研究"(项目编号:07C004)的阶段研究成果之一
关键词 前提 框架理论 图形——背景 认知语境 presupposition frame theory figure - ground cognitive context
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1马伟林.框架理论与意义识解[J].外语与外语教学,2007(10):18-21. 被引量:47
  • 2王文博.预设的认知研究[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(1):34-39. 被引量:49
  • 3何兆熊主编..新编语用学概要[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000:394.
  • 4何自然编著..语用学与英语学习[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1997:242.
  • 5Ungerer,E,Schmid,HJ.An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. . 2001 被引量:1
  • 6Ungerer,E,Schmid,HJ.An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. . 2001 被引量:1
  • 7Frege G.On Sense and Reference. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege . 1952 被引量:1
  • 8Baddeley AD.Working Memory and Language Processing. Language Processing and Simultaneous Interpreting : Interdisciplinary Perspectives . 2000 被引量:1
  • 9Fillmore,Charles J.Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica . 1985 被引量:1
  • 10Fillmore,C.Starting Where the Dictionaries Stop:The Challenge of Corpus Lexicography. Computational Approaches to the Lexicon . 1994 被引量:1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Ungerer,F&H.L.Schmid..An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M]..北京:外语教学研究出版社,,2001.... 被引量:15
  • 2Bussmann, H. 2000. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Dinsmore, J. 1981. Towards a unified theory of presupposition [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 335-363. 被引量:1
  • 4Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 被引量:1
  • 5--1997. Mapping in Thought and Language [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 6Fillmore, C. J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding [J]. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222-253. 被引量:1
  • 7Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Marmaridou, S.A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition [M]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 被引量:1
  • 9Saeed, J. I. 2000. Semantics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Bednarek,M.A.Frames Revisited-the Coherence-inducing Function of Frames[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2005,37:685-705. 被引量:1

共引文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部