摘要
对于利用没有真实基础交易背景骗取信用证进行非法融资的行为,应当结合行为人的主观目的和客观行为进行综合判定,不能因为行为人在客观上实施了骗取信用证的行为就一律认定为信用证诈骗罪。应当明确信用证欺诈与信用证诈骗罪的刑民界限,合理界分非法占用目的与非法占有目的。
The behavior abuses letters of credit for illegal financing which obtained by chicanery and there is not real trade happened,cannot be simply cognized as an illegal financing behavior.The cognizance cannot just rely on the objective act implemented by the suspect and assert the suspect as a criminal of letters of credit fraud.The cognizance should be combined with the subjective purpose of the suspect and objective conduct,and then made integrated determination deliberately.It should be clear the boundary between criminal and civil law,to distinguish the letter of credit fraud and crime of credit fraud,to differentiate explicitly and reasonably that the purpose of illegal occupation and purpose of illegal possession.This is not only the basic requirements of implementing basic principles of criminal law,but also the positive and effective way to achieve good legal effect.
出处
《新疆社会科学》
CSSCI
2011年第4期66-71,167,共6页
Social Sciences in Xinjiang
基金
上海市重点学科建设项目(S30901)资助
关键词
信用证
非法融资
刑民界限
非法占有目的
letter of credit
illegal financing
illegal possession
boundary between criminal and civil law
