摘要
目的比较股骨近端锁定板与DHS治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法 2008年7月~2010年9月手术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折120例,其中采用DHS68例,股骨近端锁定板52例。从手术时间、出血量、临床愈合时间、术后髋关节功能恢复情况及并发症等方面进行比较。结果经术后3~24个月随访,股骨近端锁定板优秀率明显高于DHS组,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论股骨近端锁定板是理想的股骨粗隆间骨折内固定物之一。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of interocha-nteric fractures of the femur using either the proximal femoral locking plate or dynamic hip screw.Methods 120 cases of interocha-nteric fratures of the femur from July 2008 to September 2010 were divided into two groups,proximal femoral locking plate group with 52 cases and DHS group with 68 cases.The clinical therapy on the following aspects:median operation time;bloodloss,healing time,function rehabilitation of hip joint and complication were compared,and the collected data were analyzed statistically.Result The superiorityrate of proximal femoral locking plate group was more than that of DHS group.The data from above aspects had significant difference(P〈0.05) .Conclusion Proximal femoral locking plate was a good internal fixationin operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.
出处
《中南医学科学杂志》
CAS
2011年第4期438-440,共3页
Medical Science Journal of Central South China
关键词
股骨粗隆间骨折
内固定
动力髋螺钉
锁定板
intertrochanteric fracture of femur
internal fixation
dynamic hip screw
locking plate