期刊文献+

厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与硝苯地平控释片联合治疗高血压疗效评价 被引量:4

Irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide tablets and nifedipine controlled-release tablets in moderate to severe enssential hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪片(含厄贝沙坦150 mg,氢氯噻嗪12.5 mg)与硝苯地平控释片(含硝苯地平30 mg)联合治疗高血压的临床疗效。方法:选择高血压患者78例,随机分为A组(口服厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪片150 mg,每日1次)、B组(口服硝苯地平控释片30 mg,每日1次)、C组(晨服厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪片150 mg,睡前服用硝苯地平控释片30 mg,每日1次),疗程均为12周。结果:3组患者血压均有下降(P<0.01),总有效率A组为61.9%,B组为64.0%,C组为93.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合硝苯地平控释片治疗高血压比单用厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪片或硝苯地平控释片更有效、安全,值得推广。 Objective:To observe the efficacy of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide tablets(IHT) and nifedipine controlled-release tablets(NCRT) in moderate to severe essential hypertension.Methods:Patients were randomly divided into A group(IHT 150 mg,per day,n=21),B group(NCRT 30 mg per day,n=25),C group(150 mg per morning,NCRT 30 mg per night,n=32),three groups were all treated for 12 weeks.Results:Blood pressure of three groups all greatly decreased(P0.01),the total effective rate in IHT groups was 61.9%;the total effective rate in NCRT groups was 64.0% the total effective rate in IHT +NCRT groups was 93.8%.Conclusions:IHT plus NCRT are more efficiency than IHT or NCRT group in the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension.So it deserve to popularize fore more efficiency and more security.
作者 王士强
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2011年第7期733-735,共3页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 高血压 厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪 硝苯地平 hypertension irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide nifedipine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1孙宁玲.优化降压治疗方案在高血压治疗中的意义——ASCOT-BPLA研究解读[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(6):416-418. 被引量:17
  • 2Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group. Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension, 2003,42:239-246. 被引量:1
  • 3Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet,2000,29;356:366-372. 被引量:1
  • 4Howe P, Phillips P, Saini R, et al.The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Irbesartan Multicenter Study Group. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999,21:1373-1396. 被引量:1
  • 5中国高血压防治指南起草委员会.1999中国高血压防治指南[J].高血压杂志,2000,8:94-112. 被引量:6
  • 6European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens,2003,21:1011-1053. 被引量:1
  • 7Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.Lancet. 1998,351:1755-1762. 被引量:1
  • 8Frattola A,Parati G,Cuspidi C,et al.Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability.J Hypertens,1993,11:1133-1137. 被引量:1
  • 9Kaneda R,Kario K,Hoshide S,et al.Morning blood pressure hyper-reactivity is an independent predictor for hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy in a community-dwelling population.Am J Hypertens,2005,18:1528-1533. 被引量:1
  • 10Kario K,Pickering TG,Umeda Y,et al.Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives:a prospective study.Circulation,2003,107:1401-1406. 被引量:1

共引文献3212

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部