期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开放手术治疗输尿管中上段结石的护理比较 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜与开放手术治疗输尿管中上段结石的护理比较。方法回顾采用后腹腔镜技术治疗输尿管中上段结石(腹腔镜组,35例)与传统的开放手术治疗输尿管中上段结石(开放手术组,33例)的护理对比分析。结果腹腔镜组术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后下床活动时间和术后住院时间均少于开放手术组,而手术时间长于开放手术组。腹腔镜组术后发生皮下气肿4例,漏尿1例。开放手术组术后有10例患者均有腰部切口处皮肤麻木或疼痛。结论后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术具有创伤小、痛苦少、恢复快、疗效与开放手术相近的优点,大大减轻基础护理负担,提高了护理效率。
出处 《中国现代医生》 2011年第20期130-131,共2页 China Modern Doctor
基金 2008年浙江省台州市路桥区科技局课题立项(2008C005)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献34

  • 1刘亚丽,寇允更,隋玉洁,张新,王云,罗佳.后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的护理[J].现代护理,2004,10(10):913-914. 被引量:10
  • 2郭志宏,杨建军.腹腔镜泌尿外科手术并发症[J].国外医学(泌尿系统分册),2005,25(5):581-584. 被引量:6
  • 3诸禹平,陈昊,朱明,亓林,周林玉,孙友文.泌尿外科腹腔镜手术并发症临床分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(7):490-492. 被引量:17
  • 4[1]Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscioy. Use of a new device[J]. J Urol,1992,148,1137-1139 被引量:1
  • 5[2]Gaur DD. Trivedis. Prahudesai MR. et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and Long - term Follow- up[J]. BTU International, 2002,89 : 339 - 343 被引量:1
  • 6岳云.麻醉中的低氧与高二氧化碳[A].刘俊杰 赵俊 主编.现代麻醉学第2版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.1216-1217. 被引量:1
  • 7Gutt CN,Oniu T,Mehrabi A,et al. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg,2004 ,21:95-105. 被引量:1
  • 8Are C,Kutka M,Talamini M,et al. Effect of laparoscopic antireflux surgery upon renal blood flow. Am J Surg,2002,183:419-423. 被引量:1
  • 9Terachi T,Yoshida O,Matsuda T,et al. Complications of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies in 370 cases in Japan:a multi-institutional study. Biomed Pharmacother,2000 ,54 :211-214. 被引量:1
  • 10TanP L. Carbondioxid absorption and gas exchange during pelvic laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth, 1992,39: 677-678. 被引量:1

共引文献134

同被引文献56

  • 1周祥福,高新,温机灵,肖翠兰,温晓飞,杨波,陆佳荪,陈兴屹,孙颖浩.平卧位微穿刺造瘘经皮肾镜碎石取石术56例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(11):728-730. 被引量:56
  • 2国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准.湖北中医杂志,2002,. 被引量:15
  • 3Steggall M J, Omara M. Urinary tractstones : types,nursing care and treatment options[J]. Br J Nurs,2008,17(9) :20-23. 被引量:1
  • 4Defarges A; Dunn M ,Berent A. New alternatives for rninimally inva- sive management of uroliths :lower urinary tract uroliths[J]. Compend Contin Educ Vet,2013,35(1 ) :2553,2772. 被引量:1
  • 5Kramolowsky EV,Wang G,Butler RM,et al. Clinical and economic impact of implementation of slow shockwave lithotripsy for the treat- ment of urinary calculi[J]. J Endourol,2010,24(9) : 1483-1486. 被引量:1
  • 6SRIVASTAVA A, AHLAWAT R, KUMAR A, et al. Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and per- cutaneous litholapaxy[J]. Br J Urol, 1992, 70(3): 252-257. 被引量:1
  • 7SALEM HK. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave llthotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi[J]. Urology, 2009, 74(6): 1216-1221. 被引量:1
  • 8Mathoera RB, Kok DJ,Verduin CM, et al. Pathological and therapeutic significance of cellular invasion by proteus mirabilis in an enterocystoplasty infection stone model[J]. Infection and Immunity, 2002,70(12) : 7022-7032. 被引量:1
  • 9Isnard A, Kouriba B, Doumbo O, et al. Association of rs7719175,1ocated in the ILl3 gene promoter, with schistosoma haematobium infection levels and identifica- tion of a susceptibility haplotype[J]. Genes and Immunity, 2011,12(1) :31-39. 被引量:1
  • 10Leroy S, Romanello C, Smolkin V, et al. Prediction of mod- erate and high grade vesicoureteral reflux after a first febrile urinary tract infection in children:Construction and internal validation of a clinical decision rule[J]. The Jour- nal of Urology, 2012,187 ( 1 ) : 265-271. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部