摘要
目的:比较单重、双重、加倍双重抗血小板治疗不稳定性心绞痛(UAP)的疗效,探讨UAP更好的治疗方案。方法:234例不稳定型心绞痛患者分为双重抗血小板组120例、单重抗血小板组114例,前两组治疗无效病例进入加倍双重抗血小板治疗组32例。观察UAP临床治疗效果。结果:双重抗血小板治疗组显效71例(59.17%),有效23例(19.17%),无效26例(21.67%)。单熏抗血小板治疗组:显效56例(49.1 2%),有效19例(16.67%),无效39例(34.21%);差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。加倍双重抗血小板治疗组:显效21例(65.63%),有效5例(15.63%),无效6例(28.6%)。结论:双重抗血小板治疗较单重抗血小板治疗有UAP治疗更好的疗效,加倍双重抗血小板治疗可以进一步提高疗效。
Objective： To compare unstable angina pectoris curative effect of single,double,double dual antiplatelet therapy.Methods：325 cases of unstable angina patients were divided into dual antiplatelet group of 120 patients,single-agent antiplatelet group 114 cases,the first two group therapy invalid cases into double dual antiplatelet therapy.Observe clinical treatment effect of unstable angina pectoris.Results：Dual antiplatelet therapy was significantly effective in 71 cases（59.17%）,effective in 23 cases（19.17%） and invalid in 26 cases（21.67%）.Single-agent antiplatelet therapy was significantly effective in 56 cases（49.12%）,effective in 19 cases（16.67%） and invalid in 39 eases（34.12%）.P〈0.05,the difference was statistically significant.Double dual antiplatelet therapy was significantly effective in 21 cases（65.63%）,effective in 5eases（15.63%） and invalid in 6cases（28.6%）.Conclusions：Dual antiplatelet therapy is more effective than single-agent antiplatetet therapy in treatment of unstable angina,double dual antiplatelet therapy can further enhance the curative effect.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2011年第6期989-990,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
