期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗精神分裂症后抑郁对照研究 被引量:4

A control study of escitalopram vs.fluoxetine in post-schizophrenic depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨艾司西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗精神分裂症后抑郁的疗效和安全性以及对认知功能的影响.方法 将60例精神分裂症后抑郁患者随机分为两组,每组30例,在维持原用抗精神病药物治疗的基础上,研究组晨口服艾司西酞普兰治疗,对照组晨口服氟西汀治疗,观察8周.于治疗前及治疗1周、2周、4周、6周、8周末采用汉密顿抑郁量表评定抑郁症状,临床疗效总评量表-病情严重程度分量表评定治疗效果,副反应量表评定不良反应;于治疗前及治疗8周末采用词汇流畅测验和威斯康星卡片分类测验评定认知功能.结果 治疗后两组汉密顿抑郁量表及临床疗效总评量表-病情严重程度分量表评分减分值随着治疗时间的延续均呈持续性升高;研究组治疗第1周末汉密顿抑郁量表及临床疗效总评量表-病情严重程度分量表减分值及总有效率均显著高于对照组(P<0.05或0.01),治疗8周末研究组总有效率为76.7%,对照组为70.0%,两组差异无显著性(χ2=0.09,P>0.05);治疗后两组词汇流畅性测验评分均显著高于治疗前(t=5.88、6.00,P<0.01),威斯康星卡片分类测验总测验数、持续错误数及随机错误数均较治疗前显著下降(P<0.05或0.01);两组不良反应程度均较轻微,发生率差异无显著性(χ2=0.07,P>0.05).结论艾司西酞普兰治疗精神分裂症后抑郁疗效与氟西汀相当,能显著改善认知功能,安全性高,依从性好,但艾司西酞普兰起效更快,可作为治疗精神分裂症后抑郁的一线药物. Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of escitalopram vs. fluoxetine in post-schizophrenic depression (PSD) and their effects on cognitive function. Methods Sixty PSD patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 one each, based on previous antipsychotic treatment research group took o- rally escitalopram in the morning and control group did fluoxetine for 8 weeks. Before treatment and at the end of the 1st , 2nd , 4th , 6th and 8th week depressive symptoms were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), effieacies with the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) and adverse reactions with the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS); before treatment and at the end of the 8th week cognitive function was assessed with the Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Results The decreased score of the CGI-SI of both groups heightened continiouely with treatment; at the end of the 1st week, the decreased scores of both the HAMD and and total effective rates were significantly higher in the research than in the control group (P〈0.05 or 0.01) ; at the end of the 8th week, total effective rates had no significant differences (76.7% vs. 70.0%, )C2 =0.09,P〉0.05) ; the VFT scores of both groups were significantly higher (t=5.88, 6.00,P〈0.01) and total, persistent error and random error number of the WCST significantly lowered (P〈0.05 or 0.01) after treatment compared with pretreatment; adverse reactions of both groups were mild, thier incidences had no significant differences (x2 =0.07, P〉0.05). Conclusion Escitalopram has efficacy equivalent to fluoxetine in post-schizophrenic depression, can improve cognitive function, has higher safety and better compliance, but escitalopram takes effect more rapidly and can be used as the first-line drug.
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2011年第4期304-306,共3页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Fava M, Kendler KS. Major depressive disorder[J]. Neuron,2000,28(2) :335. 被引量:1
  • 2沈渔州.精神病学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:441. 被引量:1
  • 3Butter MA,beeker JT,Nebes RD,et al. Changes in cog nitive functioning following treatment of late-life depression [J]. Am J Psychiatry,2000,152(12) :1949. 被引量:1
  • 4沈渔邮.精神病学[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009. 被引量:108
  • 5中华医学会编著..临床技术操作规范 精神病学分册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:91.
  • 6Kennedy SH,andersen HF,l.am RW. Efficacy of escita lopram in the treatment of major depressivc disorder corn pared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibito- rw and venlafaxine XR: a meta analysis [J]. J Psychiatry Neurosci,2006,31(4) :122. 被引量:1
  • 7司天梅,舒良.关于新抗抑郁药艾司西酞普兰[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(1):68-69. 被引量:124

二级参考文献14

  • 1Owens MJ,Knight DL,Nemeroff CB.Second generation SSRIs:human monoamine transporter binding profile of escitalopram and R-fluoxetine[J].Biol Psychiatry,2001,50:345-350. 被引量:1
  • 2Chen FH,Larsen MB,Sanchezc,et al.The S-enantiomer of R,S-citalopram,increases inhibitor binding to the human serotonin transporter by an allosteric mechanism.Comparison with other serotonin transporter inhibitors[J].Eur Neuropsychopharmacology,2005,15:193-198. 被引量:1
  • 3Mork A,Kreilgaard M,Sanchez C.The R-enantiomer of citalopram counteracts escitalopram-induced increase in extracellular 5-HT in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats[J].Neuropharmacology,2003,45:167-173. 被引量:1
  • 4Sanchez C.R-citalopram attenuates anxiolytic effects of escitalopram in a rat ultrasonic vocalization model[J].Eur J Pharmacol,2003,464:155-158. 被引量:1
  • 5Sanchez C,Gruca P,Papp M.R-citalopram counteracts the antidepressant-like effect of escitalopram in a rat chronic mild stress model of depression[J].Behav Pharmacol,2003,14:465-470. 被引量:1
  • 6Plenge P,Mellerup ET,Laursen H.Affinity modulation of[^3H]imipramine,[^3H]paroxetine and[^3H]citalopram binding to the 5-HT transporter from brain and platelets[J].Eur J Pharmacol,1991,206:243-250. 被引量:1
  • 7Fava M,Davidson KG.Definition and epidemiology of treatment resistant depression[J].Psychiatr Clin North Am,1996,19:179-200. 被引量:1
  • 8Thase ME.The Concept of Remission:validity and limitations[J].JClin Psychiatry,2006,67:478-481. 被引量:1
  • 9Thase ME.Evaluating antidepressant therapies:Remission as the optimal outcome[J].J Clin Psychiatry,2003,64(Suppl 13):18-25. 被引量:1
  • 10Murdoch D,Keam SJ.Escitalopram:a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder[J].Drugs,2005,65:2379-2404. 被引量:1

共引文献230

同被引文献47

  • 1陈玉萍.长期住院精神分裂症病人合并抑郁症状临床分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,2007,29(1):57-58. 被引量:8
  • 2Tenke CE, Kayser J, Stewart JW, et al. Novelty P3 re- ductions in depression: characterization using principal com- ponents analysis (PCA) of current source density (CSD) waveforms[J].Psychophysiology, 2010,47 ( 1 ) : 133. 被引量:1
  • 3Lepola UM, Loft H, Reines EH. Escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is effective and well tolerated in a placebo-ontrolled study in depression in primary care[J]. Int Clin Psychophar- macol, 2003, 18(4):211. 被引量:1
  • 4Knorr U, Vinberg M, Gerber U, et al. The effect of es- citalopram versus placebo on perceived stress and salivary cortisol in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with de- pression- A randomised trial[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2012,200 (2-3) :225. 被引量:1
  • 5Umbricht D, Krljes S. Mismatch negativity in schizo- phrenia: a meta-analysis[J]. Schizophr Res, 2005,76 (1) : 1. 被引量:1
  • 6Kubler A, Furdea A, Halder S, et al. A brain com- puter interface controlled auditory event-related potential (P300) spelling system for locked-in patients[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2009, 1157(1) :90. 被引量:1
  • 7Kemp AH, Pe Benito L, Quintana DS, et al. Impact of depression heterogeneity on attention: An auditory oddball event related potential study[J]. J Affect Disord, 2010, 123 (1-3) : 202. 被引量:1
  • 8Kaustio O, Partanen J, Valkonen-Korhonen M, et al. Affective and psychotic symptoms relate to different types of P300 alteration in depressive disorder[J]. J Affect Disord, 2002, 71(1-3) :43. 被引量:1
  • 9Karaaslan F, Gonul AS, Oguz A, et al. P300 changes in major depressive disorders with and without psychotic fea- tures[J]. J Affect Disord, 2003, 73(3): 283. 被引量:1
  • 10Ortiz T, Pfrez-Serrano JM, Zaglul C, et al. Deficit of cognitive event related potentials during a working task in patients with major depression [J]. Actas Esp Psiquiatr, 2003,31(4) :177. 被引量:1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部