摘要
2010年《中国-东盟自由贸易区投资协议》生效,这将极大地促进中国与东盟国家间的相互投资。本文通过比较《投资协议》和20世纪80-90年代间中国与东盟10个成员国之间签订的双边投资条约中的海外投资保险制度,分析其在政治风险和代位求偿上规定的不同,从而对中国-东盟自由贸易区海外投资保险制度的适用提出具体建议,即协议的适用需要和资本输出国国内法制度相结合、《投资协议》提供比双边投资条约更高的保护标准、与多边投资担保机构间选择的考虑因素,从而为企业投保海外投资保险提供指引。
In 2010,enforcement of China-ASEAN Investment Agreement will greatly enhance their mutual investments.By comparing the Agreement and the 10 bilateral investment agreements concluded in 1980s-1990s between China and ASEAN member states on regulations of overseas investment insurance,their differences on political risks and subrogation rights can be found.The application of overseas investment insurance in CAFTA should consider the following factors,including combined with domestic rules,higher standard of the Agreement comparing to the 10 BITs,and the choice between the Agreement and the Multilateral Investment Agency,so enterprises can get guidance to decide which agency they prefer.
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第3期20-26,共7页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
