期刊文献+

亚洲和西方国家在学科领域的活跃性和影响力比较研究 被引量:8

Comparative Study on Activity and Influence in the Areas of Disciplines in Asian and Western Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过ES I近十年的数据,得到11个国家在10个学科领域论文的学术活跃性指数、吸引力指数和皇冠指数,发现亚洲国家的化学、物理、材料科学和工程等四个学科领域占据了本国科学研究的主导地位,具有很强的优势,但是,论文质量有待提高,而美国和欧洲国家在本国的这四个学科领域的学术活跃性不高,但是,论文质量很高;美国和欧洲国家的临床医学以及生物和生物化学、分子生物和遗传学、神经科学和行为科学等新型学科领域占据了本国科学研究的比重很高,而亚洲国家正逐步加强这些新型学科的研究。 Based on the ESI data in recent 10 years and comparing the The Activity Index,The Attractivity Index and Crown Indicator results in 10 scientific research areas from 11 countries,the authors find that the scientific researches on chemistry,physics,materials science and engineering are in a dominant position in Asian countries with strong advantages,but the quality of their research papers needs to be improved,while the United States and European countries are active and superior in some new disciplines such as clinical medicine,biology and biochemistry,molecular biology and genetics,neuroscience and behavior science,which take a high proportion.And Asian countries are gradually strengthening the scientific researches on these new areas.
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期45-49,54,共6页 Journal of Intelligence
关键词 学术活跃性指数 吸引力指数 皇冠指数 ESI The Activity Index The Attractivity Index Crown Indicator ESI
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ronald N Kostoff. Citation Analysis of Research Performer Quality [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2002,53 ( 1 ) :49-71. 被引量:1
  • 2Anthony F J van Raan. Comparison of the Hirsch-index With Chemistry Research 502 Indicators and With Peer Judgment for 147 Groups [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2006 : 491 -. 被引量:1
  • 3Catharina Relm, Ulf Kronman, Daniel Wadskog. Bibliometric indicators[ EB/OL]. [ 2010-11-26]. http ://ki. se/content/1/ c6/01/79/31/Bibliometric% 20indicators% 20 - % 20definitions _1. 0. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 4Frame J D. Mainstream Research in Latin America and theCarib- bean[ J]. Intereiencia, 1977,2:143-148. 被引量:1
  • 5Garg K C, Padhi P. Scientometrics of Laser Research Literature as Viewed Through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts[ J ]. Scientometrics, 1999,45:251-268. 被引量:1
  • 6Nagpaul P S. Contributions of Indian Universities to the Mainstream Scientific literature: A Bibliometric Assessment [ J ]. Scientometrics, 1995,32 : 11-36. 被引量:1
  • 7Schubert A, Braun T. Relative Indicators and Relational Charts for Comparative Assessment of Publication Output and Citation Impact[ J]. Scientometrics, 1986,9:281-291. 被引量:1
  • 8武夷山.科学网博客[EB/OL].[2007-11-07].http://WWW.sciencenet.cn/u/Wuyishan.28. 被引量:2
  • 9黄慕萱.纳入规模考量--2008年大学科研论文成效评比改进方案研议.评监,2008,:21-23. 被引量:1
  • 10Glanzel W, Debackere K, Meyer M. ' Triad' or ' tetrad' ? on Global Changes in a Dynamic World [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2008:71-88. 被引量:1

共引文献1

同被引文献123

引证文献8

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部