期刊文献+

乒乓球运动员接发球动机冲突的框架效应和绩效

The Frame Effect and the Achievements of Table Tennis Athletes' Motive Conflict of Servics Recturn
原文传递
导出
摘要 以决策理论和动机理论为指导,采用实验心理学的研究范式,通过接发球动机冲突框架效应的调查和贴近实战的3×3组混合实验,对少年乒乓球运动员的接发球动机冲突进行了研究。结果表明:用积极性语言表述接发球情景时,运动员表现出风险规避偏好;用消极性语言表述接发球情景时,运动员表现出风险寻求偏好,产生了接发球框架效应。同时,框架效应还存在个体差异。其次,趋避动机冲突影响接发球的主动性和攻击性,在比赛分领先时,避大于趋的接发球动机有利于提高接发球的主动性和攻击性;在比分落后时,趋大于避的接发球动机有利于提高接发球的攻击性等等。从而,为教练员和运动员在接发球动机冲突情景下的决策提供理论依据。 This research takes the decision theory and the motive theory as the instructions,using the experimental psychology research model,through investigating the motive conflict frame effects and experimentally studying the docking and the drawing achievements which are close to actual combat,thorough and comprehensively researched the motive conflict of the table tennis service return.Junior table tennis athletes were studied.the results showed that when expressed service return with a positive tone,athletes demonstrated risk aversion preferences.When expressed service return with a negative tone,athletes demonstrated risk seeking preference,service return framing effect appeared.At the same time,there are individual differences in service return framing effect.Secondly,approach-avoidance motivation affected the initiative and offensive of service return,when leading in the race,the motive to avoid risks is helpful to improve the imitativeness and offensive of service return.When lagging behind in the score,the motives of preferring risks will be helpful to improve the offensiveness and initiative and so on.Thus,the paper provided theoretical basis and theoretical guidance for the coaches and athletes to make risk decision and tactics in the service return motive conflict situation.
出处 《北京体育大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期117-121,共5页 Journal of Beijing Sport University
关键词 乒乓球运动员 决策理论 接发球 动机冲突 框架效应 绩效 table tennis athletes decision-making theory service return motive conflict framing effect achievements
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1李力研.竞技运动新论[M].北京:人民体育出版社,1992.. 被引量:11
  • 2Kuhberger A.The influence of framing on risky decisions:A meta-analysis[J].Organ Behav Hum Decis Process,1998,75:23-55. 被引量:1
  • 3Tversky A,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J].Science,1981,211:453-458. 被引量:1
  • 4Lauriola M,Levin IP.Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task:An exploratory study[J].Pers Individ Dif,2001,31:215-226. 被引量:1
  • 5Rusting CL,Larsen RJ.Personality and cognitive processing of affective information[J].Pers Soc Psychol Bull,1998,24:200-213. 被引量:1
  • 6Levin IP,Gaeth JL,Schreiber J.A new look at framing effects:Distribution of effect sizes,individual differences,and independence of types of effects[J].Organ Behav Hum Decis Process,2002,88:441-429. 被引量:1
  • 7Weber EL,Hsee CK,Sokolowska J.What folklore tells about risk and risk taking? Cross-cultural comparisons of American,German and Chinese proverbs[J].Organ Behav Hum Decis Process,1998,2:170-186. 被引量:1
  • 8Dahlback O.Personality and risk-taking[J].Pers Individ Dif,1990,11:1235-1242. 被引量:1
  • 9Lauriola M,Russob PM,Lucidib F,et al.The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions[J].Pers Individ Dif,2005,38:45-59. 被引量:1
  • 10Siminoff LA,FEtting JH.Effect of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world:Impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions[J].Med Decis Making,1989,9:262-271. 被引量:1

共引文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部