摘要
目的比较单纯心得安、套扎＋心得安、硬化剂＋心得安二级预防食管静脉曲张出血的疗效，探寻心得安二级预防食管静脉曲张出血的最佳组合。方法78例食管静脉曲张出血患者随机分成3组，每组26例，止血后分别给予心得安（心得安组）、套扎＋心得安（套扎组）、硬化剂＋心得安（硬化剂组），比较各组12个月内再出血率、死亡率，以及各组门脉高压性胃病、胃底静脉曲张发生率、食管曲张静脉复发率。结果12个月内再出血率套扎组为30．77％，明显低于心得安组（53．85％）及硬化组（42．31％）（P均〈0．05）；套扎组和心得安组门脉高压性胃病及胃底静脉曲张发生率相似，都明显低于硬化组（P均〈0．05）；而食管静脉曲张再发率高于硬化组（P〈0．05）。结论在应用心得安的基础上进行套扎治疗可能是目前食管静脉曲张出血最有效的二级预防方法。
Objective To evaluate the prophylactic effects of proprauolol, propranolol plus endo-scopic variceal ligation （EVL） and propranolol plus endoscopic sclerotherapy （EVS） , and to determine the most effective combination for secondary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding. Methods After hemostasis, a total of 78 patients with esophageal variceal bleeding were randomly assigned to receive propranolol （propranolol group ）, propranolol plus EVL （ligation group ） or propranolol plus sclerotherapy （EVS group） , with 26 in each group. All patients were followed up for 12 months, and the rates of variceal rebleeding, mortality, portal hypertensive gastropathy （PHG）, re-occurrence of esophageal varices and forma- tion of gastric fundus varices were compared among different groups. Results During the 12-month follow- up, the rate of re-bleeding in EVL group （ 30. 77% ） was significantly lower than those of the EVS group （42. 31% ） or propranolol group （53.85%） （P 〈0. 05）. The occurrence of PHG and fundal varices in patients of EVL group was similar to that of propranolol group, which were both lower than that of EVS group （ P 〈 0. 05 ） , but the re-occurrence of esophageal variees in EVL group was significantly higher than that of EVS group （ P 〈 O. 05 ）. Conclusion EVL plus propranolol might be the most effective therapy for secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding.
出处
《中华消化内镜杂志》
北大核心
2011年第6期313-315,共3页
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词
食管和胃静脉曲张
心得安
套扎
硬化剂
二级预防
Esophageal and gastric varices
Propranolol
Endoscopic variceal ligation
Endo- scopic variceal sclerotherapy
Secondary prophylaxis
