摘要
1956年7、8月间郭沫若在《人民日报》上分别以"龙子"和"克拉克"为笔名发表了《发辫的争论》和《乌鸦的独白》两篇文章,通过对郭沫若以往笔名使用情况的统计与分析以及"龙子"和"克拉克"笔名内涵的阐释,可以看出作为政治人物和文学人物并存的郭沫若的生存状态,进而对如何正确认识建国后的郭沫若给出了合理的解答。
Guo Moruo published two articles,namely A Debate about the Pigtailsand The Monologue of the Crow on People＇s Dailyunder the pen names of ＂Longzi＂ and ＂Clark＂ in July and August,1956 respectively.The statistics and analysis of all the pen names used by Guo Moruo in the past,and the explanation of ＂Longzi＂ and ＂Clark＂ will surely shed light on how things were with the then Guo Moruo,a political and a literary figure at once,and will offer further reasonable answers to how to correctly evaluate the Guo Moruo after the founding of the People＇s Republic of china.
出处
《山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2011年第3期43-48,共6页
Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
2008年国家社科项目"郭沫若文学佚作的收集整理和研究"的阶段性成果
项目编号:08BZW069
关键词
郭沫若
笔名
建国后
佚作
Guo Moruo
pen name
after the founding of the People＇s Republic of China
the lost two articles
