摘要
鲁迅研究奠定于中国革命时期,在1980年代形成了之后的第二次高潮。1980年代王富仁研究模式取代陈涌模式意味着中国启蒙主义在鲁迅研究界终结了革命文化对鲁迅的权威解释。启蒙主义使用个性主义、人道主义概念来描述鲁迅的反封建思想,回避了鲁迅与中国社会进程的诸多研究课题。1980年代钱理群的鲁迅研究主要通过《野草》等文本呈现了鲁迅的心灵世界。对鲁迅的"中间物"思想的阐释构成了1980年代鲁迅研究历史的重要环节:鲁迅研究框架由启蒙主义走向现代主义。现代主义提出了启蒙主义无法包容的价值命题,汪晖、王晓明等研究者通过对鲁迅的阐释揭示了1980年代的认同危机,但现代主义的提问方式无法与鲁迅研究历史形成有力的对话,也无法结合中国社会变动与发展来讨论鲁迅的思想,最终现代主义以对鲁迅的否定和对价值问题的简单解决终结了1980年代的鲁迅研究。
Research on Lu Xun,which was established during the revolutionary period of China,reached its second climax in 1980s,when Wang Furen＇s research model replaced Chen Yong＇s research model,which means that the Enlightenment in China terminated the authoritative interpretation of Lu Xun by the revolutionary culture in the field of studies of Lu Xun.Enlightenmentism in China describes Lu Xun＇s anti-feudal ideas by using the concepts of individualism and humanism,thus avoiding many research topics concerning Lu Xun and the course of the Chinese society.In 1980s,Qian Liqun＇s research on Lu Xun presents Lu Xun＇s spiritual world mainly through an analysis of Wild Grass and other texts by Lu Xun.Interpretations of Lu Xun＇s ideas of ＂intermediate things＂ constitute an important link of Lu Xun＇s research on history ackowledged in 1980s： the framework for research on Lu Xun moved from Enlightenmentism to modernism.Modernism raises the propositions of value which cannot be tolerated by Enlightenmentism.Researchers like Wang Hui,Wang Xiaoming,etc.reveal the crisis of identity in 1980s through interpretations of Lu Xun,but the ways in which modernism raises questions cannot possibly form forceful dialogues with Lu Xun＇s studies of history,nor can they be used to discuss Lu Xun＇s thoughts in combination with social changes and developments in China.At last,modernism put an end to the studies of Lu Xun in 1980s by negating Lu Xun and providing simple solutions to the questions of value.
出处
《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期75-86,共12页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
