期刊文献+

单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合内固定治疗腰椎滑脱症的效果 被引量:35

Clinical outcome of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spine spondylolisthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbodyfusion,MiTLIF)内固定治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床效果。方法:2007年1月~2010年3月163例腰椎滑脱症患者接受单节段MiTLIF和内固定治疗。男61例,女102例;年龄37~72岁,平均51.6岁。退变性腰椎滑脱97例,峡部裂性腰椎滑脱66例;Ⅰ度滑脱135例,Ⅱ度28例;L3滑脱7例,L4 86例,L5 70例。采用经最长肌和多裂肌间隙入路,可扩张工作通道置于关节突上,行MiTLIF和经皮椎弓根螺钉固定。将163例患者按时间顺序依次分为A组(第1~55例)、B组(第56~110例)和C组(第111~163例),统计手术时间、术中X线暴露时间、术中和术后出血量及并发症发生情况,并进行组间比较。采用腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和功能障碍指数(ODI)评分评估临床效果,腰椎薄层CT扫描重建评价椎间融合情况。结果:163例术中出血100~750ml,平均330ml;术后出血10~175ml,平均57ml;手术时间83~230min,平均145min;术中X线暴露时间27~126s,平均59s。B组术中出血量和X线暴露时间与A组比较及C组手术时间、X线暴露时间、术中和术后出血量与A组比较均明显减少(P〈0.05);C组手术时间、术中X线暴露时间、术中和术后出血量与B组比较亦明显减少(P〈0.05)。7例术中硬膜囊撕裂,其中A组4例,B组2例,C组1例,均在术后第2天出现脑脊液漏,经对症处理术后5d内脑脊液漏停止。4例术后出现新的神经根损害表现,均为A组病例,通过内窥镜下减压和神经根松解后神经根损害症状消失。91例患者获得10~47个月随访,平均24.5个月。术前、术后3d及末次随访腰痛VAS评分分别为6.8±2.4分、1.5±0.6分和0.8±0.4分,术后3d及末次随访与术前比较有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。术前及末次随访ODI评分分别为39.4±5.1分和11.3±2.6分,差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。末次随访椎间融合率为96.7%(88/91� Objective:To evaluate the surgical effect of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MiTLIF) for lumbar spine spondylolisthesis.Method:From January 2007 to March 2010,163 cases(61 males and 102 females) suffering lumbar spine spondylolisthesis underwent MiTLIF.The mean age was 51.6 years(range,37-72 years),and the preoperative pathogenesis included degenerative spondylolisthesis(n=97) and isthmic spondylolisthesis(n=66).There were 135 grade 1 and 28 grade 2 in terms of spondylolisthesis.The involved levels were 7 L3,86 L4 and 70 L5.One-level transforaminal decompression and intebody fusion with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under Quadrant retractor system was performed in all cases.All 163 cases were divided into 3 groups chronologically:group A(N0.1 to 55),group B(N0.56 to 110),group C(NO.111 to 163).The operative time,X-ray exposure time,blood loss and complications were measured and analyzed.Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analog scale(VAS) and the Oswestry disability index(ODI).Fusion rates were assessed using CT scan and 3-dimensional reconstruction.Result:163 patients had an average intraoperative blood loss of 330ml(100-750ml),average postoperative blood loss of 57ml(10-175ml),average operative time of 145min(83-230min),average X-ray exposure time of 59s(27-126s).The intraoperative blood loss and radiation time in group B decreased significantly compared with group A(P0.05),and these indexes in group C decreased significantly compared with group A and B(P0.05).7 cases were complicated with dural tear,4 in group A,2 in group B and 1 in group C,and all were followed by cerebrospinal fluid leakage at the 2nd day after operation and ceased within 5 days after correspondent intervention.Four patients in group A developed onset nerve root irritation after operation and resolved after endoscopic decompression.91 cases were followed up for a mean of 24.5 months(10-47 months).The
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期399-403,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 腰椎滑脱症 微创外科 经椎间孔腰椎间融合术 内固定 Lumbar spondylolisthesis Minimally invasive surgery Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Isaacs RE,Podichetty VK,Santiago P,et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation[J].J Neurosurg Spine, 2005,3 (2) : 98-105. 被引量:1
  • 2Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) :technical feasibility and initial results [J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18 (Suppl 1) :1-6. 被引量:1
  • 3Scheufler KM,Dohmen H,Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability [J].Neurosurgery,2007,60 (4 Suppl 2) :203-212. 被引量:1
  • 4Wang J,Zhou Y,Zhang ZF, et al. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthruie spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2[J].Eur Spine J,2010,19(10) : 1780-1784. 被引量:1
  • 5Harms JG,Jeszenszky D.The unilateral transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].Orthop Traumatol, 1998,6(2) :88-89. 被引量:1
  • 6Humphreys SC,Hodges SD,Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbndy fusion[J].Spine, 2001,26 (5) : 567-571. 被引量:1
  • 7Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery:a histologic and enzymatic analysis[J].Spine, 1996,21 (8) : 941-944. 被引量:1
  • 8Kawaguchi Y,Matsui H,Tsuji H.Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery(Part 2):histologic and histochemical analyses in humans[J].Spine, 1994,19(22) :2598-2602. 被引量:1
  • 9Styf JR,Willen J.The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans[Jl. Spine, 1998,23 (3) : 354-358. 被引量:1
  • 10蔡明,郦志文,何腾峰,李方财,陈其昕.经椎间孔单枚融合器植骨椎体间融合术治疗腰椎疾患[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20(6):520-521. 被引量:10

二级参考文献38

共引文献73

同被引文献400

引证文献35

二级引证文献231

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部