期刊文献+

宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ锥切术后病理切缘阳性的多因素分析 被引量:15

Multivariate Analysis on Post-conization Positive Surgical Margin in Patients with Stage Ⅲ Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ(cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaⅢ,CINⅢ)锥切病理切缘阳性的高危因素及进一步处理的选择。方法回顾性分析我院2004年1月~2010年4月442例因CINⅢ住院行冷刀锥切的临床资料,其中术后病理切缘阳性41例(切缘阳性组),切缘阴性401例(切缘阴性组)。结果多因素分析显示切缘阳性与宫颈重度糜烂(OR=3.438,95%CI=1.323~8.933),原位癌(OR=3.792,95%CI=1.594~9.022),病变累及腺体(OR=3.940,95%CI=1.724~9.004),病变点数〉3个(OR=5.083,95%CI=2.192~11.787)相关。切缘阳性组21例接受了再次手术,残留病灶发生率38.1%(8/21),与切缘阴性组14.8%(8/54)无统计学差异(Z=1.898,P=0.058)。切缘阳性组20例接受随访,病变持续存在或复发率为15.0%(3/20),显著高于切缘阴性组1.7%(3/241)(Z=2.799,P=0.005)。结论病变点数〉3个、病变累及腺体、原位癌、病变大小(宫颈糜烂外观)是CINⅢ切缘阳性的高危因素。切缘阳性与病变复发/持续有关。如果再次锥切不可能时,切缘阳性的患者可行子宫全切术,对于要求保留生育功能的患者应严密随访。 Objective To assess the high-risk factors associated with conization margin status and management options in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ(CIN Ⅲ). Methods A retrospective analysis on 442 patients with CIN Ⅲ who underwent conization between January 2004 and April 2010 in our hospital.Postoperative pathological analysis showed positive surgical margin in 41 cases(positive group),and negative margin in the other 401 cases(negative group). Results Binary logistic analysis showed that positive margin is correlated with severe cervical erosion(OR=3.438,95%CI=1.323-8.933),in situ carcinoma(OR=3.792,95%CI=1.594-9.022),involvement of the glands(OR=3.940,95%CI=1.724-9.004),and 3 lesions(OR=5.083,95%CI=2.192-11.787).In our patients,the 21 cases of positive margin received a second surgery,after which the rate of residual lesion was 38.1%(8/21),which was similar to that in the negative group(14.8%,8/54;Z=1.898,P=0.058).A follow-up was achieved in 20 of the 21 positive patients,during the follow-up,3 patients showed recurrence or persisitence of the lesion(15.0%);the rate was significantly higher than that in the negative group(1.7%,3/241,Z=2.799,P=0.005).Conclusions More than 3 lesions,glands involvement,in situ carcinoma,and cervical erosion are high-risk factors of positive surgical margin in patients with CIN Ⅲ.The positive margin is associated with recurrence/persistence.If re-conization is technically impossible,simple hysterectomy is the treatment option for the patients with positive margins.The patients with CIN Ⅲ should be followed up closely,especially for those with positive margins.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2011年第3期196-199,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ 宫颈锥切 切缘阳性 Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ Conization Positive margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Wright TC Jr,Massad LS,Dunton CJ,et al.2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2007,197(4):340-345. 被引量:1
  • 2Ghaem-Maghami S,Sagi S,Majeed G,et al.Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure:a meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol,2007,8(11):985-993. 被引量:1
  • 3Bruinsma F,Lumley J,Tan J,et al.Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth.BJOG,2007,114(1):70-80. 被引量:1
  • 4楼卓鑫,张天厚,贺晶.宫颈机能不全47例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(3):179-180. 被引量:31
  • 5Barvara C,Moore M,Robert V,et al.Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1995,173(2):361-368. 被引量:1
  • 6王玲,吴红,姚红霞,徐静.宫颈上皮内瘤变锥切术切缘阳性患者临床特征分析[J].中国临床医学,2007,14(6):861-862. 被引量:3
  • 7Wright YC Jr,Cox JT,Massad LS,et al.2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189(1):295-304. 被引量:1
  • 8White CD.Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia extending to the margins of resection in conization of the cervix.J Reprod Med,1991,36 (9):635-638. 被引量:1
  • 9Salani R,Ren I,Bristow RE,et al.Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix:a meta analysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(2):182e1-e5. 被引量:1
  • 10Lapaquette TK,Dinh TV,Hannigan EV,et al.Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.Obstet Gynecol,1993,82(3):440-443. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Beck WW.Baltimore.williams and wilkins.Obstetrics and Gynecology,4th ed,1996,190. 被引量:1
  • 2Daya S.Evidence-based management of recurrent miscarriage.Optimal diagnostic protocol.International Congress Series,2004,1266:318 ~ 327. 被引量:1
  • 3Zilianti M,Azuga A,Calderon F,et al.Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography.J Ultrasound Med,1995; 14(6):719~ 724. 被引量:1
  • 4Naumann RW,Bell MC,Alvarez RD,et al. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1994 ,55(2) :224- 228. 被引量:1
  • 5Gimpelson RJ,Graham B. Using amino cerv after cervical LEEP [J]. J Reprod Med, 1999,44(3) :275-278. 被引量:1
  • 6Das N ,Jackson NS. Lopes ADB, et al. Recurrent smear abnormalities where repeat loop treatment is not possible:is hystereetomy the answer? [J]. Gynecol Oncol,2005,97(3) ;751-754. 被引量:1
  • 7Natee J, Therasakvichaya S, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following I.EEP or conization[J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2005, 88(10) : 1344-1348. 被引量:1
  • 8Jeng CJ, Shen J, Huang SH. Partial trachelectomy: a new treatment choice for persistent or trcurrent high grade cervical intraepithelisl neoplasia[J]. Gynecal Oncol ,2006,100(2) :231-232. 被引量:1
  • 9袁俊斋,张小玲,王瑜.宫颈环扎术治疗孕中期宫颈机能不全的妊娠结局[J].生殖与避孕,2004,24(1):59-60. 被引量:36

共引文献32

同被引文献127

引证文献15

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部