摘要
在西方学术界,马克思与正义理论之间关系的争论持续了半个多世纪。争论主要涉及两个核心问题:(1)马克思是否谴责资本主义为非正义,换言之,马克思的资本主义剥削批判理论是否依赖正义概念?(2)马克思的革命和解放是建立在历史必然性基础上,还是建立在正义的要求和原则基础上,按劳分配和按需分配原则可以理解为分配正义原则吗?在这两个问题上,西方马克思主义者当中存在着肯定论和否定论两种立场。这里首先考察它们之间争论的核心分歧;其次,在考察当代平等主义正义论基础上,笔者把马克思的立场概括为"超越正义的正义论"。
In western academia,the debate on the relationship between Marx and Justice has lasted over half a century.The controversy mainly involves two core issues: first,whether or not Karl Marx blamed capitalism as an unjust system,or in other words,whether Marx's theory of exploitation was based on the notion of justice;second,whether Marx's revolution and emancipation was established on the basis of historic inevitability or on the basis of the requirement and principle of justice,whether the principle of distribution according to work and on-demand principle can be understood as distribution justice principles.Concerning these two issues,the positive side and the negative side diametrically oppose each other among western Marxists.This paper first focuses on their core dispute,and then points out that Marx's standing point can be summed up as the 'justice beyond justice' after observing the contemporary equalitarian justice theory.
出处
《江海学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期45-51,238,共7页
Jianghai Academic Journal
