摘要
软实力概念自约瑟夫.奈提出以后,迅速进入了各国的对外政策话语体系。本文将分析中国、欧盟及其成员国对软实力及相关概念的认知,并加以比较。本文认为,中欧在软实力概念的使用中在软权力资源、软实力目标、软实力运用、软实力主体和软实力外交的地位五个方面存在着明显的认知差异,这些差异对双边关系带来了四方面的负面影响:价值观差异带来的政策分歧、软实力使用方式差异引发的政策冲突、软实力外交的地位差异产生的外交议程错位,以及软实力主体差异导致欧洲民间与中国政府之间的冲撞。从中欧关系的健康发展出发,本文提出了三个方面的尝试性建议,以缓和或消解这些差异认识对中欧关系的负面影响。
After the concept of soft power was first introduced by Joseph S. Nye Jr, it quickly entered the foreign policy discourses of most countries. This paper makes an analysis and comparison of the perceptions of China, the EU and its member states on the concept of soft power. It argues that perception gaps exist between China and EU on the five dimensions of soft power, that is, its resources, objectives, means, position in foreign policy and the roles of government. A variety of negative effects have thus been exerted on China-EU relations. In order to promote the healthy development of the bilateral relations, this paper puts forward some suggestions aimed at eliminating or at least relieving the negative impacts of the conceptual gap.
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期46-60,159,共15页
Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金
同济大学国家985项目"国家结构性实力研究"课题的中期成果
陈志敏教授主持的欧盟让.莫内项目
潘忠岐教授主持的2010年度上海市浦江人才计划"核心政治概念的认知分歧对中欧关系的影响"资助
